Re: [Algorithms] General purpose task parallel threading approach
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
|
From: Mat N. <mat...@bu...> - 2009-04-14 18:48:02
|
If the genericity or flexibility comes at the price of hiding information, then it's not as desirable. A useful attribute to consider is whether you have to run code in order to make reasonable assumptions of its behavior. If you do, it is less desirable than if you don't. MSN From: Sebastian Sylvan [mailto:seb...@gm...] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:23 AM To: Game Development Algorithms Subject: Re: [Algorithms] General purpose task parallel threading approach On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Mat Noguchi <mat...@bu...<mailto:mat...@bu...>> wrote: > Generality and flexibility are considered desirable features in most cases - therefore pointing out the lack of flexibility in some aspect of a system is an entirely valid criticism. I think the whole point of the other side of this discussion is that generality and flexibility are not necessarily desirable features. In what sense is less flexibility preferable? I mean, I get that in a certain specific scenario you may go for a solution that is less flexible if it offers, say, more performance, but that doesn't mean that everything else being equal you wouldn't prefer to have the flexibility too. -- Sebastian Sylvan +44(0)7857-300802 UIN: 44640862 |