Re: [Algorithms] General purpose task parallel threading approach
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
|
From: Adrian B. <ad...@gm...> - 2009-04-12 23:22:43
|
It sounded like your mechanism has similar downsides as fibers (i.e. much higher memory overhead, slight efficiency overhead) vs. explicitly coded state machines and such. Unless I'm confused, that would probably be a deal breaker for the majority of our code. Cheers, Adrian On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM, <asy...@gm...> wrote: > But guys, I would really like to have your feedback on asynclib which I'm > trying to make as generic as I can. > I need to know what functionality you want which I don't have. Would you > like to override the scheduling part of the library ? Is there a > functionality which you don't like how it was presented and so on? > > Alexander. |