Re: [Algorithms] Comparing apples to apples : compression libraries

[Glen M. <gle...@di...>]

I'm curious what hardware this was tested on. My experiments with zlib on 
consoles was very disappointing.

peace

"John W. Ratcliff" <jo...@si...> wrote in message 
news:004f01c88ed0

Testing Compression rate and speed with various compressors.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Compress:CT_CRYPTO  :FROM: 10,436,335 TO:  2,498,433   23%    1,170 MS
Compress:CT_MINILZO :FROM: 10,436,335 TO:  3,940,072   37%       97 MS
Compress:CT_ZLIB    :FROM: 10,436,335 TO:  3,299,771   31%      157 MS
Compress:CT_BZIP    :FROM: 10,436,335 TO:  2,270,695   21%    1,544 MS
---------------------------------------------------------------
Testing Decompression speed with various decompressors.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Decompress:CT_CRYPTO  :FROM:  2,498,433 TO: 10,436,335      258 MS
Decompress:CT_MINILZO :FROM:  3,940,072 TO: 10,436,335       42 MS
Decompress:CT_ZLIB    :FROM:  3,299,771 TO: 10,436,335       69 MS
Decompress:CT_BZIP    :FROM:  2,270,695 TO: 10,436,335      390 MS