Re: [Algorithms] (no subject)
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
From: <Pau...@sc...> - 2005-12-05 16:08:04
|
gda...@li... wrote on 05/12/2005 15:56:11: > OK, this is my 2peneth on LCP's. > It MIGHT be that impulse constraints are infact already equivalent > to the iterative solution to the LCP and the results of Dirks > solution will be identical to an iteratively solved LCP except with > (logically) less overhead. I thought an LCP wouldn't correctly propagate momentum, making them different...? Ta, Paul. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify pos...@sc... This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for all known viruses. ********************************************************************** Sony Computer Entertainment Europe |