RE: [GDAlgorithms-List] Re: [Algorithms] Message format

[Pallister, K. <kim...@in...>]

[Algos] is even better

Also, giving folks a day or two's warning would be good, so we can massage
our Outlook rules before our inboxes are beseiged.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen J Baker [mailto:sj...@li...]
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 6:16 AM
> To: gda...@li...
> Subject: Re: [GDAlgorithms-List] Re: [Algorithms] Message format
> 
> 
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, gl wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I'm doing this publically Tom to get a consensus (or 
> otherwise).  Can we
> > change the subject list title to be shorter?  Right now it 
> eats too much
> > subject real-estate.
> > 
> > I suggest simply [GDAlgos-List], and if poss. drop the GD 
> too.  It might not
> > seem like much, but it matters to me (opinions?).
> 
> The '-List' part seems pretty redundant too.
> 
> [Algorithms] would be best IMHO.
> 
> 
> Steve Baker                      (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail)
> L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax)
> Work: sj...@li...           http://www.link.com
> Home: sjb...@ai...       http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GDAlgorithms-list mailing list
> GDA...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/gdalgorithms-list
>