[Algos] is even better
Also, giving folks a day or two's warning would be good, so we can massage
our Outlook rules before our inboxes are beseiged.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen J Baker [mailto:sj...@li...]
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 6:16 AM
> To: gda...@li...
> Subject: Re: [GDAlgorithms-List] Re: [Algorithms] Message format
>
>
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, gl wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm doing this publically Tom to get a consensus (or
> otherwise). Can we
> > change the subject list title to be shorter? Right now it
> eats too much
> > subject real-estate.
> >
> > I suggest simply [GDAlgos-List], and if poss. drop the GD
> too. It might not
> > seem like much, but it matters to me (opinions?).
>
> The '-List' part seems pretty redundant too.
>
> [Algorithms] would be best IMHO.
>
>
> Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail)
> L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax)
> Work: sj...@li... http://www.link.com
> Home: sjb...@ai... http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GDAlgorithms-list mailing list
> GDA...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/gdalgorithms-list
>
|
