Re: [Gcc4cli-devel] README

[Andrea C. O. <and...@gm...>]

The creation of the sourceforge projects with mailinglists.

Andrea

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote:
> I think it is not too bad: July 2009.
>
> Since then, we could add:
>
>
> 2010-03
>        Move binutils to a new repository.
>        Cleanup of binutils: improved code size thanks to the use of the
> short forms of ldc/ldloc/stloc/ldarg and branch opcodes.
>        Several bug fixes.
> 2010-01
>        Emission source location when -g is active.
>
>
>
> Anything else?
>
> --
> Erven.
>
> Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit :
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cli.html
>> It is probably a little out of date :)
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> I already changed the wiki on sourceforge
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/gcc4cli/index.php?title=Main_Page
>>>> I cannot change the README and the html pages on gcc from here.
>>>
>>> I just updated the README.
>>> What HTML page are you talking about?
>>>
>>>> I am ok with the changes and also having the mono based one as
>>>> preferred.
>>>>
>>>> After a short period of transition I would like to empty the dirs
>>>> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/binutils and
>>>> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/mono-based-binutils and keep
>>>> there (in both) just a README file saying that the code has been moved
>>>> to the sourceforge project with the proper links
>>>
>>> Fine with me.
>>>
>>>> Erven, you know better than me who are the users at this point,
>>>> I let you decide how long is this 'short period' :)
>>>
>>> I think we mostly have IBM Haifa, INRIA, and Politecnico di Milano (ie
>>> Harvard).
>>> I am going to tell them.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Erven.
>>>
>>>> I will create a couple of mailing list also for cli binutils (one for
>>>> the ci and one for the development discussions)
>>>>
>>>> Andrea
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ciao Andrea,
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks for the various fixes.
>>>>> Probably, we should update the README in gcc.../branches/st/README to
>>>>> reflect
>>>>> the new binutils location.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am also tempted to change the order of the sections: first the build
>>>>> instructions for the Mono toolchain, then DotGnu. Maybe we can also say
>>>>> the Mono
>>>>> is the preferred way?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Erven.
>>
>
>