Re: [Gcc4cli-devel] README

[Andrea C. O. <and...@gm...>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cli.html
It is probably a little out of date :)

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote:
> Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit :
>>
>> I already changed the wiki on sourceforge
>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/gcc4cli/index.php?title=Main_Page
>> I cannot change the README and the html pages on gcc from here.
>
> I just updated the README.
> What HTML page are you talking about?
>
>> I am ok with the changes and also having the mono based one as preferred.
>>
>> After a short period of transition I would like to empty the dirs
>> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/binutils and
>> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/mono-based-binutils and keep
>> there (in both) just a README file saying that the code has been moved
>> to the sourceforge project with the proper links
>
> Fine with me.
>
>>
>> Erven, you know better than me who are the users at this point,
>> I let you decide how long is this 'short period' :)
>
> I think we mostly have IBM Haifa, INRIA, and Politecnico di Milano (ie
> Harvard).
> I am going to tell them.
>
> --
> Erven.
>
>>
>> I will create a couple of mailing list also for cli binutils (one for
>> the ci and one for the development discussions)
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ciao Andrea,
>>>
>>> Many thanks for the various fixes.
>>> Probably, we should update the README in gcc.../branches/st/README to
>>> reflect
>>> the new binutils location.
>>>
>>> I am also tempted to change the order of the sections: first the build
>>> instructions for the Mono toolchain, then DotGnu. Maybe we can also say
>>> the Mono
>>> is the preferred way?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Erven.
>