From: Erven R. <erv...@in...> - 2010-03-23 13:51:03
|
Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit : > I already changed the wiki on sourceforge > https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/gcc4cli/index.php?title=Main_Page > I cannot change the README and the html pages on gcc from here. I just updated the README. What HTML page are you talking about? > I am ok with the changes and also having the mono based one as preferred. > > After a short period of transition I would like to empty the dirs > svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/binutils and > svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/mono-based-binutils and keep > there (in both) just a README file saying that the code has been moved > to the sourceforge project with the proper links Fine with me. > > Erven, you know better than me who are the users at this point, > I let you decide how long is this 'short period' :) I think we mostly have IBM Haifa, INRIA, and Politecnico di Milano (ie Harvard). I am going to tell them. -- Erven. > > I will create a couple of mailing list also for cli binutils (one for > the ci and one for the development discussions) > > Andrea > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote: >> Ciao Andrea, >> >> Many thanks for the various fixes. >> Probably, we should update the README in gcc.../branches/st/README to reflect >> the new binutils location. >> >> I am also tempted to change the order of the sections: first the build >> instructions for the Mono toolchain, then DotGnu. Maybe we can also say the Mono >> is the preferred way? >> >> -- >> Erven. |