Re: [Gcc4cli-devel] setjmp

[Gabriele S. <gab...@gm...>]

2010/2/19 Erven Rohou <erv...@in...>:
> Ciao,
>
> Many benchmarks (unfortunately) use setjmp and longjmp, which we do not support.
> However, longjmp is often used to handle exceptional situations, mostly errors.
> Here is a proposal: we could define setjmp to return 0, and longjmp to abort (or
> print a message and abort,...) We could compile and run benchmarks that do not
> have errors. Probably we keep a warning in the header file.
> What do you think?

Sounds like a good idea, I believe most of the stuff will work well
under normal conditions.

 Gabriele