Menu
▾
▴
gcc4cli-devel
|
From: Erven R. <erv...@in...> - 2010-03-23 07:40:58
|
Ciao Andrea, Many thanks for the various fixes. Probably, we should update the README in gcc.../branches/st/README to reflect the new binutils location. I am also tempted to change the order of the sections: first the build instructions for the Mono toolchain, then DotGnu. Maybe we can also say the Mono is the preferred way? -- Erven. |
|
From: Andrea C. O. <and...@gm...> - 2010-03-23 11:26:47
|
I already changed the wiki on sourceforge https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/gcc4cli/index.php?title=Main_Page I cannot change the README and the html pages on gcc from here. I am ok with the changes and also having the mono based one as preferred. After a short period of transition I would like to empty the dirs svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/binutils and svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/mono-based-binutils and keep there (in both) just a README file saying that the code has been moved to the sourceforge project with the proper links Erven, you know better than me who are the users at this point, I let you decide how long is this 'short period' :) I will create a couple of mailing list also for cli binutils (one for the ci and one for the development discussions) Andrea On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote: > Ciao Andrea, > > Many thanks for the various fixes. > Probably, we should update the README in gcc.../branches/st/README to reflect > the new binutils location. > > I am also tempted to change the order of the sections: first the build > instructions for the Mono toolchain, then DotGnu. Maybe we can also say the Mono > is the preferred way? > > -- > Erven. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Gcc4cli-devel mailing list > Gcc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gcc4cli-devel > |
|
From: Erven R. <erv...@in...> - 2010-03-23 13:51:03
|
Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit : > I already changed the wiki on sourceforge > https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/gcc4cli/index.php?title=Main_Page > I cannot change the README and the html pages on gcc from here. I just updated the README. What HTML page are you talking about? > I am ok with the changes and also having the mono based one as preferred. > > After a short period of transition I would like to empty the dirs > svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/binutils and > svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/mono-based-binutils and keep > there (in both) just a README file saying that the code has been moved > to the sourceforge project with the proper links Fine with me. > > Erven, you know better than me who are the users at this point, > I let you decide how long is this 'short period' :) I think we mostly have IBM Haifa, INRIA, and Politecnico di Milano (ie Harvard). I am going to tell them. -- Erven. > > I will create a couple of mailing list also for cli binutils (one for > the ci and one for the development discussions) > > Andrea > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote: >> Ciao Andrea, >> >> Many thanks for the various fixes. >> Probably, we should update the README in gcc.../branches/st/README to reflect >> the new binutils location. >> >> I am also tempted to change the order of the sections: first the build >> instructions for the Mono toolchain, then DotGnu. Maybe we can also say the Mono >> is the preferred way? >> >> -- >> Erven. |
|
From: Andrea C. O. <and...@gm...> - 2010-03-23 14:08:46
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cli.html It is probably a little out of date :) On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote: > Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit : >> >> I already changed the wiki on sourceforge >> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/gcc4cli/index.php?title=Main_Page >> I cannot change the README and the html pages on gcc from here. > > I just updated the README. > What HTML page are you talking about? > >> I am ok with the changes and also having the mono based one as preferred. >> >> After a short period of transition I would like to empty the dirs >> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/binutils and >> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/mono-based-binutils and keep >> there (in both) just a README file saying that the code has been moved >> to the sourceforge project with the proper links > > Fine with me. > >> >> Erven, you know better than me who are the users at this point, >> I let you decide how long is this 'short period' :) > > I think we mostly have IBM Haifa, INRIA, and Politecnico di Milano (ie > Harvard). > I am going to tell them. > > -- > Erven. > >> >> I will create a couple of mailing list also for cli binutils (one for >> the ci and one for the development discussions) >> >> Andrea >> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote: >>> >>> Ciao Andrea, >>> >>> Many thanks for the various fixes. >>> Probably, we should update the README in gcc.../branches/st/README to >>> reflect >>> the new binutils location. >>> >>> I am also tempted to change the order of the sections: first the build >>> instructions for the Mono toolchain, then DotGnu. Maybe we can also say >>> the Mono >>> is the preferred way? >>> >>> -- >>> Erven. > |
|
From: Erven R. <erv...@in...> - 2010-03-23 14:31:16
|
I think it is not too bad: July 2009. Since then, we could add: 2010-03 Move binutils to a new repository. Cleanup of binutils: improved code size thanks to the use of the short forms of ldc/ldloc/stloc/ldarg and branch opcodes. Several bug fixes. 2010-01 Emission source location when -g is active. Anything else? -- Erven. Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit : > http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cli.html > It is probably a little out of date :) > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote: >> Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit : >>> I already changed the wiki on sourceforge >>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/gcc4cli/index.php?title=Main_Page >>> I cannot change the README and the html pages on gcc from here. >> I just updated the README. >> What HTML page are you talking about? >> >>> I am ok with the changes and also having the mono based one as preferred. >>> >>> After a short period of transition I would like to empty the dirs >>> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/binutils and >>> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/mono-based-binutils and keep >>> there (in both) just a README file saying that the code has been moved >>> to the sourceforge project with the proper links >> Fine with me. >> >>> Erven, you know better than me who are the users at this point, >>> I let you decide how long is this 'short period' :) >> I think we mostly have IBM Haifa, INRIA, and Politecnico di Milano (ie >> Harvard). >> I am going to tell them. >> >> -- >> Erven. >> >>> I will create a couple of mailing list also for cli binutils (one for >>> the ci and one for the development discussions) >>> >>> Andrea >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote: >>>> Ciao Andrea, >>>> >>>> Many thanks for the various fixes. >>>> Probably, we should update the README in gcc.../branches/st/README to >>>> reflect >>>> the new binutils location. >>>> >>>> I am also tempted to change the order of the sections: first the build >>>> instructions for the Mono toolchain, then DotGnu. Maybe we can also say >>>> the Mono >>>> is the preferred way? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Erven. > |
|
From: Andrea C. O. <and...@gm...> - 2010-03-24 13:25:06
|
The creation of the sourceforge projects with mailinglists. Andrea On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote: > I think it is not too bad: July 2009. > > Since then, we could add: > > > 2010-03 > Move binutils to a new repository. > Cleanup of binutils: improved code size thanks to the use of the > short forms of ldc/ldloc/stloc/ldarg and branch opcodes. > Several bug fixes. > 2010-01 > Emission source location when -g is active. > > > > Anything else? > > -- > Erven. > > Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit : >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cli.html >> It is probably a little out of date :) >> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> wrote: >>> >>> Andrea Carlo Ornstein a écrit : >>>> >>>> I already changed the wiki on sourceforge >>>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/gcc4cli/index.php?title=Main_Page >>>> I cannot change the README and the html pages on gcc from here. >>> >>> I just updated the README. >>> What HTML page are you talking about? >>> >>>> I am ok with the changes and also having the mono based one as >>>> preferred. >>>> >>>> After a short period of transition I would like to empty the dirs >>>> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/binutils and >>>> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/st/mono-based-binutils and keep >>>> there (in both) just a README file saying that the code has been moved >>>> to the sourceforge project with the proper links >>> >>> Fine with me. >>> >>>> Erven, you know better than me who are the users at this point, >>>> I let you decide how long is this 'short period' :) >>> >>> I think we mostly have IBM Haifa, INRIA, and Politecnico di Milano (ie >>> Harvard). >>> I am going to tell them. >>> >>> -- >>> Erven. >>> >>>> I will create a couple of mailing list also for cli binutils (one for >>>> the ci and one for the development discussions) >>>> >>>> Andrea >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Erven Rohou <erv...@in...> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ciao Andrea, >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks for the various fixes. >>>>> Probably, we should update the README in gcc.../branches/st/README to >>>>> reflect >>>>> the new binutils location. >>>>> >>>>> I am also tempted to change the order of the sections: first the build >>>>> instructions for the Mono toolchain, then DotGnu. Maybe we can also say >>>>> the Mono >>>>> is the preferred way? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Erven. >> > > |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X