From: Andrew J. S. <as...@te...> - 2021-06-28 12:51:46
|
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:56:03AM +0200, Manuel Collado wrote: > >Maybe that'd do. Can such a function use the statement next? How'd > >that work, the plugin calling the function triggering next? That's a very interesting question. I imagine that all hell would break loose. > The idea was to let the plugin invoke the user function. But I was a > bit wrong. The current API doesn't provide such facility. It would > be necessary to extend the API in order to allow an extension to > call a gawk user function. That seems like a more plausible API extension to me. The code is probably similar to how indirect function calls are implemented (Op_indirect_func_call), I'd guess. Regards, Andy |