RE: [Gaul-devel] Compiling the examples under AIX

[Mike C. <m.c...@au...>]

Thanks Andrew and also Stewart Adcock, your advice has enabled me to
successfully run ./configure on AIX.

I then do a gmake, and everything seems fine.

Unfortunately when I try to run any of the examples(such as 'wildfire', =
or
any of the others), all I get is=20

Segmentation Fault.

I don't know much about how C/C++ linkers work but perhaps some =
libraries
are not being linked correctly? Can you possibly advise as to how I =
could
check that?

Thanks for your time,
Mike.



-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew W. Nosenko [mailto:and...@gm...]=20
Sent: Friday, 12 May 2006 10:10 p.m.
To: Mike Cooling
Cc: gau...@li...
Subject: Re: [Gaul-devel] Compiling the examples under AIX

On 5/11/06, Mike Cooling <m.c...@au...> wrote:
> >Sorry, but why 'CC=3Dxls'?  IIRC, the C compiler called xlc...  In =
the
> >your first message you used 'CC=3Dxlc'  (the right name) also...
>
> Yes, I accidently put xls in instead of xlc (too much time spend with =
MS
> products? :) ). However, replacing xls with xlc doesn't alter the =
result.
>
> Here is a summary of three attempts:
>
[skip]
>
> hpc 26% ./configure CC=3Dxlc CXX=3DxlC LDFLAGS=3D/usr/local/lib
--enable-slang=3Dno

My mistake.  There needed not 'LDFLAGS=3D/usr/local/lib' but
'LDFLAGS=3D-L/usr/local/lib' (pay attention on the '-L' after '=3D' =
sign).

The same mistake in the CPPFLAGS also was made by me:
instead of 'CPPFLAGS=3D/usr/local/include', there should be used
CPPFLAGS=3D'-I/usr/local/include' (pay attention on the '-I' (as in =
'Include')
after '=3D' sign).

--=20
Andrew W. Nosenko <and...@gm...>