Re: [gate-users] Bug reports

[Valentin T. <v.t...@sh...>]

    Hi,

There are also feature requests from last week which have been closed.
So yes, the SF tracker is used and it is the right way of reporting
problems.

About your bug reports: the ontology API is being completely overhauled
for the next gate release which is now imminent. The Jena backend will
probably be completely removed and replaced with a different library. So
I shall be closing the bugs you opened as "wontfix" as they refer to the
old version of the Ontology API and it makes no sense for us to spend
effort supporting that.

The first error you report is coming directly from Jena, so there's
nothing we could do about it anyway. The other two are probably not so
annoying, so they'll have to stay like this until the new version is
released.

    Valentin



Jethro Borsje wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I just did some bug reports on the SourceForge bug tracker of GATE 
> (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=143829&atid=756796). However, 
> I saw that there are bugs there of 2006 which do not seemed to have been 
> addressed. Is the bug tracker on SourceForge still used, or should I 
> report the bugs elsewhere?
>
>