From: Brad N. <bni...@no...> - 2007-09-19 17:36:37
|
>>> On 9/19/2007 at 11:01 AM, in message <d4c...@ma...>, "Bernard = Li" <be...@va...> wrote: > On 9/19/07, Brad Nicholes <BNI...@no...> wrote: >=20 >> Wow, this is the scenario that I was afraid of. I am by no means an = expert=20 > in this area, but this seems broken on OSX. In this case you are = correct,=20 > POLLHUP really means nothing. Your original patch is probably the way = to go. >=20 > All right folks, I'll go ahead and generate another RC. >=20 > BTW Brad, should I also check in the changes to trunk since apr cannot > be used to resolve this? >=20 Yes, I had previously checked my patch into trunk. So my patch will have = to be reverted and Mike's checked in. Brad |