From: Gilles F. <gil...@fr...> - 2004-04-08 19:05:34
|
Lyle Johnson a =E9crit : >=20 > On Apr 5, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Gilles Filippini wrote: [snip] > OK. I saw the bug reports, but haven't had a chance to run the table=20 > test case yet. Until I can reproduce the treelist-based bug on one of m= y=20 > machines I'm not sure how to proceed. I've been running the tests on my= =20 > Mac OS X box, perhaps I need to see if I can reproduce the crashes unde= r=20 > Linux. Update: * I rebooted my box to give the treelist test case a try using a fresh=20 system: same segfault at count=3D59. * Tried the test case on two other machines (RedHat 7.2 and Debian=20 Woody): no segfault. Since it seems I am for now the only one having this problem I propose=20 setting this bug low priority. I would appreciate if someone using a Debian Sarge would run the test=20 case and report about it. _gilles. [The bug report on SF is updated accordingly to this post] |