Re: [Fxruby-users] Segfaults

[Lyle J. <ly...@kn...>]

On Apr 5, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Gilles Filippini wrote:

> I don't think so: the fact is that it segfaults precisely at count = 
> 59. Would it be memory related I guess its behavior would be much less 
> predictible.

Yes, on reflection I think you're right that it wouldn't be so easily 
reproducible on your machine if there were some memory fault.

> BTW I have other processes running (Apache, MySQL, Oracle, Mozilla, 
> aMule, distributed.net, ...) with an uptime of about one week and I 
> didn't notice anything weird.

OK.

> I've made another test with GC disabled: no segfault (updated the 
> sourceforge bug page).
> I'll try to run it tomorrow at work on another machine.
> Stay tuned...

OK. I saw the bug reports, but haven't had a chance to run the table 
test case yet. Until I can reproduce the treelist-based bug on one of 
my machines I'm not sure how to proceed. I've been running the tests on 
my Mac OS X box, perhaps I need to see if I can reproduce the crashes 
under Linux.