Re: [Fxruby-users] Segfaults
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
lyle
From: Gilles F. <gil...@fr...> - 2004-04-05 15:48:16
|
ly...@kn... a =E9crit : > On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 10:22:47 +0200, Gilles Filippini > <gil...@fr...> wrote : >=20 >=20 >>It takes about 60 iterations on may box. But this problems may eventual= y=20 >>be unrelated to FXRuby: >> >>- the segfault occurs without any Ruby msg. It's a brutal segfault: >>... >>count =3D 58 >>count =3D 59 >>Erreur de segmentation >>maison:~/devel/bug$ >> >>- I've run the very same test case using valgrind and it's gone as far=20 >>as 6000+ before I stop it. >> >>Well... I don't know where to look now :/ >=20 >=20 > Is there any possibility at all that some of this machine's memory (RAM= ) is > going bad? I don't think so: the fact is that it segfaults precisely at count =3D 59= .=20 Would it be memory related I guess its behavior would be much less=20 predictible. BTW I have other processes running (Apache, MySQL, Oracle, Mozilla,=20 aMule, distributed.net, ...) with an uptime of about one week and I=20 didn't notice anything weird. > For what it's worth, I did go back and rebuild FXRuby-1.0.28 from the > sources and ran the test case for several thousand iterations before fi= nally > killing it. So I'm fairly sure there is some other problem afoot. I've made another test with GC disabled: no segfault (updated the=20 sourceforge bug page). I'll try to run it tomorrow at work on another machine. Stay tuned... _gilles. |