Re: [Fxruby-users] API documentation
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
lyle
From: Lyle J. <jl...@cf...> - 2003-09-04 14:59:11
|
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote: > OK, then is is worth raising these issues with Jeroen? Bearing in > mind comments below, of course. I'm not sure how to answer the question. While not presuming to speak for Jeroen, I think he'd probably agree with you that (for example) a 2-D canvas object would be a nice thing to have. To put things in perspective, there's a survey running at the FOX Community Wiki site: http://www.fifthplanet.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl that indicates many additional things that people would like to see for FOX (including, as you mentioned, better documentation). So I think it's worthwhile to raise these points, if for no other reason to add your voice to the chorus asking for feature X or Y. At the same time, it is important to understand that, for the most part, Jeroen is primarily going to work on things that are interesting to him. |