Re: [Fxruby-users] Treelist -- can't add new items with data.
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
lyle
From: Hugh S. S. E. E. <hg...@dm...> - 2003-08-15 10:35:30
|
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, ly...@kn... wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:42:01 +0100 (BST), Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng > <hg...@dm...> wrote : > > > Thank you, but before I trouble you with that, is there any way to > > get Fox to produce lots of logging? > > If you're running under Linux/Unix, and if you didn't build your FOX library Solaris at the moment.... > > ruby hello.rb -tracelevel 101 Thanks, I'll give that a spin and let you know if this helps. > > I'm not sure where that output goes on Windows (if it's printed at all) > since you usually don't have a console present. And for that matter, I don't Might be OK with rb files, but not rbw... Something to try later... [....] > > [If only one could ask it things, like SHRDLU!] > > Indeed. > > You know, it's funny, there was a Slashdot article just yesterday asking > what people's expectations were for computers ten years ago (i.e. ten years > ago, what were your expectations for computers in the year 2003?) And wasn't I think I expected more full-parallax 3D displays, but didn't expect the huge disk sizes so common now. Better quality synthetic speech, too. > the work on SHRDLU done in the sixties or something? I do wonder a little 1968. Other revisions up till about 73 from what I can find briefly with google. > bit about what the remaining challenges are that /do/ prevent us from just > asking the computer questions and getting a response. I think it is limited by how much the human writing the code can hold in their head. A constraint that varies from person to person! > > Of course, like Dilbert's pointy-haired boss, since I don't understand it, I > assume it must be easy to do ;) A bit like "Anything is possible for the person who doesn't have to do it themselves" :-) I gather that the parsing of English requires info from the higher, semantic, levels and this increased the complexity of the code in this case. But I wouldn't mind asking it using Ruby: it is the ability to respond_to?() methods like why() that would really help! Keeping a history of decisions.... > Hugh |