Thread: [Fxruby-users] [ANN] FXRuby 1.2a1 Now Available
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
lyle
Menu
▾
▴
fxruby-users
|
From: Lyle J. <ly...@kn...> - 2004-06-29 17:16:57
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (This is a re-send, apologies if you see this message twice...) All, The first alpha release of FXRuby 1.2 is now available for download here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php? group_id=20243&package_id=14608&release_id=248453 As previously discussed on the mailing list, we're going to at least experiment with a RubyGems-based distribution. The files "fxruby-1.2.0.gem.gz" and "fxruby-1.2.0.gem.zip" are both source gems and have identical contents. The file "fxruby-1.2.0-mswin32.gem.zip" is a binary gem (for Windows), compatible with the latest Ruby 1.8.1 installer for Windows. Instructions about how to install these gems are provided here: http://www.fxruby.org/doc/gems.html A few general comments about this first release can be found here: htttp://www.fxruby.org/doc/changes.html Finally, please be aware that there are a number of changes between FXRuby 1.0 and 1.2, and at least skim the "What's New" document mentioned in the change notes before asking questions. Also be sure to use the bug reporting system at FXRuby's SourceForge project page to report problems: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=20243&atid=120243 Thanks, Lyle -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFA4aQKFXV/hD6oMd0RAmgbAJ9kIBunqT3QJ2HLwvFRleJzDcYd+wCfVD3b SmSg3s0ZqoVqmVZOFeFkWGI= =D6kp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Lyle J. <ly...@kn...> - 2004-06-29 05:34:09
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All, The first alpha release of FXRuby 1.2 is now available for download here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php? group_id=20243&package_id=14608&release_id=248453 As previously discussed on the mailing list, we're going to at least experiment with a RubyGems-based distribution. The files "fxruby-1.2.0.gem.gz" and "fxruby-1.2.0.gem.zip" are both source gems and have identical contents. The file "fxruby-1.2.0-mswin32.gem.zip" is a binary gem (for Windows), compatible with the latest Ruby 1.8.1 installer for Windows. Instructions about how to install these gems are provided here: http://www.fxruby.org/doc/gems.html A few general comments about this first release can be found here: htttp://www.fxruby.org/doc/changes.html Finally, please be aware that there are a number of changes between FXRuby 1.0 and 1.2, and at least skim the "What's New" document mentioned in the change notes before asking questions. Also be sure to use the bug reporting system at FXRuby's SourceForge project page to report problems: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=20243&atid=120243 Thanks, Lyle -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFA4P9HFXV/hD6oMd0RAjFWAKCdZ+MiNJrfNbUIDS5s+QtJbLOnPgCgmlOI CVxwdgGtgXTQ4IvAor3fIpg= =DH9N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Lyle J. <ly...@kn...> - 2004-07-05 15:06:25
|
On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:16 AM, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote: > Could you clarify, preferably on the pages themselves, which version > http://www.fxruby.org/doc/api/files/rdoc-sources/README_rdoc.html > and > http://www.fxruby.org/doc/book.html > refer to, because it is not entirely clear to me. I expect that they > are > still 1.0 while 1.2 is in alpha, but I suspect that having the > version referenced in the document would be useful during the > transition periods for the various (informal) mirrors. Good call. Actually, I think it's the case that the docs on the web site at this moment actually reflect the 1.2 version and you can't get to the 1.0 version (although this is easily remedied). Ultimately, I think I want *both* versions available online, and so we need to see what kind of directory structure makes sense. Is something as simple as: http://www.fxruby.org/doc/1.0/book.html http://www.fxruby.org/doc/1.0/api/** and similar subdirectories for doc/1.2 going to work? I think I can also add a symbolic link in there so that the old links (e.g. http://www.fxruby.org/doc/book.html) still point to the 1.0 versions. What makes the most sense? Lyle |
|
From: Hugh S. S. E. E. <hg...@dm...> - 2004-07-05 16:19:12
|
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Lyle Johnson wrote: > > Ultimately, I think I want *both* versions available online, and so we need > to see what kind of directory structure makes sense. Is something as simple > as: > > http://www.fxruby.org/doc/1.0/book.html > http://www.fxruby.org/doc/1.0/api/** > > and similar subdirectories for doc/1.2 going to work? I think I can also add Seems OK to me, but it should be visible in the (top at least) page which version one is reading, because of symlinks. > a symbolic link in there so that the old links (e.g. > http://www.fxruby.org/doc/book.html) still point to the 1.0 versions. Should that apply to the stable version, rather than fixed for 1.0, or did you mean that (as the two are synonymous at present)? Else www.fxruby.org/doc/stable/book.html is a symlink to.... > > What makes the most sense? > > Lyle Hugh |
|
From: Rich <ri...@li...> - 2004-06-29 20:24:09
|
Thanks Lyle!! -Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lyle Johnson" <ly...@kn...> To: <fxr...@li...>; <fxr...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:16 AM Subject: [Fxruby-users] [ANN] FXRuby 1.2a1 Now Available > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > (This is a re-send, apologies if you see this message twice...) > > All, > > The first alpha release of FXRuby 1.2 is now available for download > here: > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php? > group_id=20243&package_id=14608&release_id=248453 > > As previously discussed on the mailing list, we're going to at least > experiment with a RubyGems-based distribution. The files > "fxruby-1.2.0.gem.gz" and "fxruby-1.2.0.gem.zip" are both source gems > and have identical contents. The file "fxruby-1.2.0-mswin32.gem.zip" is > a binary gem (for Windows), compatible with the latest Ruby 1.8.1 > installer for Windows. > > Instructions about how to install these gems are provided here: > > http://www.fxruby.org/doc/gems.html > > A few general comments about this first release can be found here: > > htttp://www.fxruby.org/doc/changes.html > > Finally, please be aware that there are a number of changes between > FXRuby 1.0 and 1.2, and at least skim the "What's New" document > mentioned in the change notes before asking questions. Also be sure to > use the bug reporting system at FXRuby's SourceForge project page to > report problems: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=20243&atid=120243 > > Thanks, > > Lyle > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFA4aQKFXV/hD6oMd0RAmgbAJ9kIBunqT3QJ2HLwvFRleJzDcYd+wCfVD3b > SmSg3s0ZqoVqmVZOFeFkWGI= > =D6kp > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > Fxruby-users mailing list > Fxr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fxruby-users > |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X