Re: [Fx2lib-devel] Setupdata at 0xe000
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
mulicheng
From: Daniel O'C. <doc...@gs...> - 2011-09-16 12:00:31
|
On 16/09/2011, at 20:26, Chris McClelland wrote: > Interesting. But I think we should ask ourselves where the string > descriptors really belong. Are the arguments for putting the string > descriptors in code mem or xdata mem equally valid? If so then it boils > down to the arbitrary positioning of the code/xdata boundary. If not > then we should choose one or the other and stick with it. I think there's a good argument for putting it at 0xe000 because it saves precious code memory :) I don't think there is any performance consideration one way or the other. The only reason I'd think to leave it would be because of existing code (which isn't necessarily a small thing!) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C |