Re: [Fx2lib-devel] Deprecation warnings

[Daniel O'C. <doc...@gs...>]

On 17/07/2010, at 24:45, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>> entries, would be nice to convert to that one of these days.  I'm not  
>> sure where I like __interrupt, __at et al.   Perhaps just changing  
>> them is best.
> 
> I would be inclined to add something to the makefiles like...

I read the manual a bit and found this..

Certain words that are valid identifiers in the standard may be reserved words in SDCC unless the --std- c89 or --std-c99 command line options are used. These may include (depending on the selected processor): ’at’, ’banked’, ’bit’, ’code’, ’critical’, ’data’, ’eeprom’, ’far’, ’flash’, ’idata’, ’interrupt’, ’near’, ’nonbanked’, ’pdata’, ’reentrant’, ’sbit’, ’sfr’, ’shadowregs’, ’sram’, ’using’, ’wparam’, ’xdata’, ’_overlay’, ’_asm’, ’_en- dasm’, and ’_naked’. The compiler displays a warning "keyword <keyword> is deprecated, use ’__<key- word>’ instead" in such cases. The warning can be disabled by using "#pragma disable_warning 197" in the source file or "–disable-warning 197" command line option. Compliant equivalents of these keywords are always available in a form that begin with two underscores, f.e. ’__data’ instead of ’data’ and ’__asm’ instead of ’_asm’.

So perhaps using that pragma makes sense for a few SDCC revisions. That said SDCC 2.9.0 understands them.

--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C