Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Understand how to get efficient rulesets
Brought to you by:
mikehorn
From: Whit B. <wh...@tr...> - 2009-07-20 02:08:46
|
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 06:34:53PM -0700, Vadim Kurland ✎ wrote: > the rule that matches ESTABLISHED,RELATED you quoted above permits reply > packets for sessions opened from inside going out. It does not permit > just everything outbound. I understood that. As I said "... means that Direction 'Outbound' is automaticly allowed, without explicit action in the GUI, for anything allowed 'Inbound' to start." Once something is allowed to initiate from outside, the outgoing reply qualifies as ESTABLISHED,RELATED, so the rule lets the Outbound out. We're both saying the same thing there. My point was just that anything set in the GUI as allowed Inbound, for the particular transaction, is allowed back Outbound by that rule so doesn't need the Outbound GUI arrow explicitly showing it. That's not always the style in which this is handled. Those of us in the previous habit of setting individual ESTABLISHED or ESTABLISHED,RELATED rules for Outbound responses on specific Inbound ports might expect that the GUI requires both the up and down arrows showing in order to correspond with the behavior. It doesn't. That's fine. I'm just trying to clarify where someone who knows iptables somewhat well but is used to different design patterns can get tripped up on the GUI. It doesn't matter to me now that I understand it better, but it might matter to the next person, so this is in the "Get the rock you tripped over off the path" category of trying to help out. I like Firewall Builder a lot. I'll be using it extensively. Just thinking it can be a contribution to show the places where a new person of somewhat typical sysadmin background can get confused by it, at least leaving a record of the confusions and resolutions in the discussion list here, so the next person confused might find it in the archive. That's often where I've found solutions to problems with other packages over the years, in their discussion lists. Whit |