Thread: Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Firewall Builder 2.0.8 and what is coming
Brought to you by:
mikehorn
From: Robert K. <sve...@ma...> - 2005-07-18 17:28:55
|
Hallo Vadim, thanks for your great tool, from the features for the next version especially the routing feature seems very usefull to me. Best regards Robert |
From: Don H. <don...@ya...> - 2005-07-22 05:17:01
|
> Personally, I would like traffic shaping support with upcoming fw-bilder = > version.=20 > > My thoughts are, that you have all the data for all the interfaces and = > you also plan to implement a MARK TARGET. With this kind of information = > it should be possible to implement a consistent way of traffic shaping = > which uses the marked packets to determine how this traffic has to be = > treated. I too would like to see support for shaping/queueing etc. (Thinking of iptables specifically here). Many Thanks, Don Harvie |
From: ted c. <tcr...@ea...> - 2005-07-23 15:28:55
|
With VOIP on the horizon, QOS wold be beneficial. tedc -----Original Message----- From: fwb...@li... [mailto:fwb...@li...] On Behalf Of Don Harvie Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:17 PM To: fwb...@li... Subject: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Re: Firewall Builder 2.0.8 and what is coming > Personally, I would like traffic shaping support with upcoming > fw-bilder = version.=20 > > My thoughts are, that you have all the data for all the interfaces and > = you also plan to implement a MARK TARGET. With this kind of > information = it should be possible to implement a consistent way of > traffic shaping = which uses the marked packets to determine how this > traffic has to be = treated. I too would like to see support for shaping/queueing etc. (Thinking of iptables specifically here). Many Thanks, Don Harvie ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list Fwb...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion |
From: Tom D. <td...@ro...> - 2005-07-23 16:56:22
|
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, ted creedon wrote: > With VOIP on the horizon, QOS wold be beneficial. +1 > -----Original Message----- > From: fwb...@li... > [mailto:fwb...@li...] On Behalf Of Don > Harvie > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:17 PM > To: fwb...@li... > Subject: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Re: Firewall Builder 2.0.8 and what is > coming > > > Personally, I would like traffic shaping support with upcoming > > fw-bilder = version.=20 > > > > My thoughts are, that you have all the data for all the interfaces and > > = you also plan to implement a MARK TARGET. With this kind of > > information = it should be possible to implement a consistent way of > > traffic shaping = which uses the marked packets to determine how this > > traffic has to be = treated. > > I too would like to see support for shaping/queueing etc. (Thinking of > iptables specifically here). Tom Diehl td...@ro... Spamtrap address mt...@ro... |
From: Vadim K. <va...@vk...> - 2005-07-23 17:43:52
|
On Jul 23, 2005, at 8:28 AM, ted creedon wrote: > With VOIP on the horizon, QOS wold be beneficial. > I see many people vote for QoS. How do you guys see it supported in fwbuilder, conceptually ? I am going to add MARK target , that takes care of traffic classification. My understanding of QoS support in fwbuilder is that it should provide some kind of intuitive queue and queue disciplines management system. This is fairly large project and although I would really like to implement it, I think it merits its own major release (read, v2.4) --vk > tedc > > -----Original Message----- > From: fwb...@li... > [mailto:fwb...@li...] On Behalf > Of Don > Harvie > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:17 PM > To: fwb...@li... > Subject: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Re: Firewall Builder 2.0.8 and what is > coming > > >> Personally, I would like traffic shaping support with upcoming >> fw-bilder = version.=20 >> >> My thoughts are, that you have all the data for all the interfaces >> and >> = you also plan to implement a MARK TARGET. With this kind of >> information = it should be possible to implement a consistent way of >> traffic shaping = which uses the marked packets to determine how this >> traffic has to be = treated. >> > > I too would like to see support for shaping/queueing etc. (Thinking of > iptables specifically here). > > Many Thanks, > Don Harvie > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration > Strategies from > IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative > Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list > Fwb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list > Fwb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion > |
From: ted c. <tcr...@ea...> - 2005-07-23 18:15:21
|
It does merit its own release, and it might build on QoS/BGP upported by Linux. Perhaps separating out the fwbuilder and a GUI to the existing QoS might be a possibility. Other OS's I'm not familiar with. tedc -----Original Message----- From: fwb...@li... [mailto:fwb...@li...] On Behalf Of Vadim Kurland Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 10:44 AM To: ted creedon Cc: fwb...@li... Subject: Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Re: Firewall Builder 2.0.8 and what is coming On Jul 23, 2005, at 8:28 AM, ted creedon wrote: > With VOIP on the horizon, QOS wold be beneficial. > I see many people vote for QoS. How do you guys see it supported in fwbuilder, conceptually ? I am going to add MARK target , that takes care of traffic classification. My understanding of QoS support in fwbuilder is that it should provide some kind of intuitive queue and queue disciplines management system. This is fairly large project and although I would really like to implement it, I think it merits its own major release (read, v2.4) --vk > tedc > > -----Original Message----- > From: fwb...@li... > [mailto:fwb...@li...] On Behalf Of > Don Harvie > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:17 PM > To: fwb...@li... > Subject: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Re: Firewall Builder 2.0.8 and what is > coming > > >> Personally, I would like traffic shaping support with upcoming >> fw-bilder = version.=20 >> >> My thoughts are, that you have all the data for all the interfaces >> and >> = you also plan to implement a MARK TARGET. With this kind of >> information = it should be possible to implement a consistent way of >> traffic shaping = which uses the marked packets to determine how this >> traffic has to be = treated. >> > > I too would like to see support for shaping/queueing etc. (Thinking of > iptables specifically here). > > Many Thanks, > Don Harvie > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration > Strategies from > IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative > Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list > Fwb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list > Fwb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list Fwb...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion |
From: Michael S. <mi...@mu...> - 2005-07-24 09:49:05
|
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2005 19:43 schrieb Vadim Kurland: > On Jul 23, 2005, at 8:28 AM, ted creedon wrote: > > With VOIP on the horizon, QOS wold be beneficial. > > I see many people vote for QoS. How do you guys see it supported in > fwbuilder, conceptually ? I am going to add MARK target , that takes > care of traffic classification. My understanding of QoS support in > fwbuilder is that it should provide some kind of intuitive queue and > queue disciplines management system. This is fairly large project and > although I would really like to implement it, I think it merits its > own major release (read, v2.4) > > --vk Hi, QoS support is built into Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control=20 (LARTC.org). There are a lot of different queues fwbuilder could use. For a= n=20 example you could look a the wondershaper script=20 (http://www.lartc.org/wondershaper). This script shapes the traffic on a DS= L=20 line so that uploads do not disturb downloads. You also could prefer some=20 protocols like SSH. I don't know about queueing in other OSs. The fwbuilder QoS-GUI should be as intuitive as the firewalling part. I=20 personally like the floodgate GUI of Checkpoint. In my opinion fwbuilder should not only mark the packets, but also build th= e=20 queues. So with pressing "compile / installation" eveything should be done.= =20 Something like "beginners proof". Perhaps in a first step the packets could= =20 be MARKed ... Sincerely, =2D-=20 Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff MultiNET Services GmbH Bretonischer Ring 7 85630 Grasbrunn Tel: (+49 89) 456 911 - 0 =46ax: (+49 89) 456 911 - 21 mob: (+49 174) 343 28 75 PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B Skype: misch42 |
From: ryan <ry...@zo...> - 2005-07-24 16:49:23
|
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > Hi, > > QoS support is built into Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control > (LARTC.org). There are a lot of different queues fwbuilder could use. For an > example you could look a the wondershaper script > (http://www.lartc.org/wondershaper). This script shapes the traffic on a DSL > line so that uploads do not disturb downloads. You also could prefer some > protocols like SSH. > For whatever its worth, the Wondershaper script works, but is a bit overzealous by default. My Vonage phone would experience dropoffs and poor call quality when my firewall was running Wondershaper. |
From: Hildebrand, B. <Bri...@un...> - 2005-07-25 17:43:13
|
Vadim, I would like to see the following RFE's make it into the next build: [ 1151204 ] A way to identify duplicate IP Addresses [ 1116454 ] Where Used Option Especially the one for the "Where Used" option. I think these both would = be really useful additions and probably wouldn't take too much work to = implement.=20 Thank you, Brian |