Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] xml files future version

[<vadim@vk...>]

On Feb 19, 2006, at 12:26 PM, tedc wrote:

> Vadim Kurland =E2=9C=8D wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2006, at 12:05 PM, ted creedon wrote:
>>
>>> Compiling 2.0.10 works fine on a SUSE 9.3 box, however when =20
>>> executin fwbuilder, popups show =E2=80=9C*.xml created by future =20
>>> revision of fwbuilder=E2=80=9D and then fwbuilder segfaults.
>>>
>>
>> the version is encoded in the first two or three lines of the xml =20
>> file, please check what it is. You can post it here, use command =20
>> 'head -3 file.fwb'.
>>
>> We haven't released version newer than 2.0.10 so I do not know how =20=

>> you could get the file made by the newer version.
>>
>> --vk
>>
> There was an older version on the box but it was rpm --erased
>

the versions match. What about libfwbuilder package ? Did you remove =20
it too when you upgraded fwbuilder ? Try "rpm -qa | grep fwb"

--vk


> <?xml version=3D"1.0" encoding=3D"utf-8"?>
> <!DOCTYPE FWObjectDatabase SYSTEM "fwbuilder.dtd">
> <FWObjectDatabase xmlns=3D"http://www.fwbuilder.org/1.0/"; =20
> version=3D"2.0.10" id=3D"root">
>
> fwbuilder -v
> 2.0.10
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through =20
> log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD =20
> SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?=20
> cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&dat=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list
> Fwbuilder-discussion@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion
>
>
> !DSPAM:43f8d4e2212581563264213!
>

Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] xml files future version

[tedc <tcreedon@ea...>]

Vadim Kurland ✍ wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2006, at 12:05 PM, ted creedon wrote:
>
>> Compiling 2.0.10 works fine on a SUSE 9.3 box, however when executin 
>> fwbuilder, popups show “*.xml created by future revision of 
>> fwbuilder” and then fwbuilder segfaults.
>>
>
> the version is encoded in the first two or three lines of the xml 
> file, please check what it is. You can post it here, use command 'head 
> -3 file.fwb'.
>
> We haven't released version newer than 2.0.10 so I do not know how you 
> could get the file made by the newer version.
>
> --vk
>
There was an older version on the box but it was rpm --erased

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE FWObjectDatabase SYSTEM "fwbuilder.dtd">
<FWObjectDatabase xmlns="http://www.fwbuilder.org/1.0/"; version="2.0.10" 
id="root">

fwbuilder -v
2.0.10

Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] xml files future version

[<vadim@vk...>]

On Feb 19, 2006, at 12:05 PM, ted creedon wrote:

> Compiling 2.0.10 works fine on a SUSE 9.3 box, however when =20
> executin fwbuilder, popups show =93*.xml created by future revision =20=

> of fwbuilder=94 and then fwbuilder segfaults.

the version is encoded in the first two or three lines of the xml =20
file, please check what it is. You can post it here, use command =20
'head -3 file.fwb'.

We haven't released version newer than 2.0.10 so I do not know how =20
you could get the file made by the newer version.

--vk

[Fwbuilder-discussion] xml files future version

[ted creedon <tcreedon@ea...>]

Compiling 2.0.10 works fine on a SUSE 9.3 box, however when executin
fwbuilder, popups show "*.xml created by future revision of fwbuilder" and
then fwbuilder segfaults.

 

Any clues?

 

tedc

[Fwbuilder-discussion] technical question re: Bittorrent

[Claude Jones <claude_jones@le...>]

I've got bittorrent working well with fwbuilder. It's set up as a separate 
rule so I can quickly enable/disable. Using Azureus I can see that it's 
working properly. It's just a custom TCP rule opening destination ports 
6881-6889 with no masks or settings. According to my reading, though, there's 
supposed to be a UDP port 6881 opened for communication, as I recall. I 
realized that I hadn't opened that UDP port on my home machine last night, 
after I started downloading a torrent (I'd configured UDP on my office 
machine which also works well.) Yet, all worked well. Is this because the UDP 
talk is considered stateful and is permitted? 
-- 
Claude Jones
Bluemont, VA, USA

Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] firewall

[<vadim@vk...>]

On Feb 19, 2006, at 5:22 AM, wassila Nadjia wrote:

> salutation:
>
> Can you indicate me please how to compile  a source programme's of  
> fwbuilder under Qt designer ? version 2.0.10
>                Thanks


build instructions are posted on the web site here:

http://www.fwbuilder.org/archives/cat_installation.html#000153

--vk

[Fwbuilder-discussion] firewall

[wassila Nadjia <zenjabile5000@ya...>]

salutation:
   
  Can you indicate me please how to compile  a source programme's of fwbuilder under Qt designer ? version 2.0.10
                 Thanks

		
---------------------------------
 Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.Téléchargez la version beta.