|
From: Olivier C. <oli...@fr...> - 2001-01-22 10:51:44
|
Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > On 18 Jan 2001 23:54:11 +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > > Now I think that we need to add a *lot* of names. > > I think you don't know yet what is it to manage 960 icons to suggest a lot > of new names! :) Even with only one icon set it may be a problem. I begin to saw: I've almost finished a 16x16-gnome icon set ... But a symlink is an easy way to build an icon. > > Can you please prepare a full listing (including existing ones) accourding > to our comments. If you don't agree with me, you may try to argue or push > your suggestions anyway if you are sure they are needed. More existing > icons may be removed if are not useful enough. > > After we have a full listing (say 85 icons), we may start to search for > missing icons in all icon sets. And probably we will have some changes > in the list, because it is not useful to have all symlinks. > OK, Olivier |