|
From: Olivier C. <oli...@fr...> - 2000-07-29 08:31:16
|
Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2000 22:29:00 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > * Modules Colorsets > > ------------------- > > > > Colorset 10: default module colorset: FvwmPager FvwmButtonColorset. > > Can be use for *FvwmIconMan*Colorset FvwmIconBoxColorset (see also > > colorset 12) > > > > Colorset 11: hilight default colorset: for hilighting a part of > > of an FvwmButton or a certain swallowed applications. > > > > Colorset 12: special colorset: as 10 but a more funny colors a gradien > > or a pixmap. > > I know you mean blackbox theme. No, this special color is already use in other themes as default, olicha, aftersetp. The modules theme may want to have a clean colorset for setting say the background of IconMan/Box or a more funny color for these. > Somehow I don't like the trick with > substituting another colorset at run time when using certain theme. > Maybe we should introduce an auto-conditional options in our CDDS, which > are like current user-definable options, but switch is done automatically > accourding to the given conditions. This will be great. > > Colorset 13: Pager hilight colorset > > Can't colorset 11 be used for this? I don't quite understand colorset 11. > Yes > > Colorset 14: tips colorset (Pager, TaskBar) > > > > Colorset 15: colorsets for swallowed applications > > Maybe swallowed applications should use colorsets 10/11? I don't know. > > > Colorset 16: colorset for more colors in a swallowed application > > (e.g., xclock & xload have -hl & -hd color) > > My previous idea to have -hl & -hd in one colorset (fg/bg) pobably can't > work, because black/black is bad for bg/fg and I don't want to make this > xclock/xload specific. On the other hand I have no better ideas. > > > Colorset 17: colorset for a normal button in the AppMans (IconBox, IconMan, > > TaskBar, WinList) > > AppMan name is ok, but I like more a generic name WinList for modules that > show a list of windows. :) AppList? But why app, it handles any window, > it may be several windows per application. Somewhat off-topic. > > > Colorset 18: colorset for a button which represent a window > > with the focus in the AppMans. > > > > Colorset 19: colorset for a button which represent an iconified > > window in the AppMans. > > Still 3 colorsets for WinLists? There are so many boolean window states > like iconified (maximized, shaded, sticky, visible), some of them may be > supported in some feature, maybe to leave a colorset for this additional > state? Or a bad idea? > > But at least we need a way to mark a selected window button (i.e. the one > with a mouse pointer on it). FvwmIconMan supports this. Alex wanted this > and I promissed to do something here. > So I have to add a colorset pointed button and reserve one colorset for future use or more? > > Colorset 20: FvwmIdentColorset > > > > Colorset 21: FvwmScrollColorset (do we need this colorset, colorset 32 is > > ok? or Colorset 0?) > > Or 10. :) Well, probably we don't need this, but what colorset to use? > Is it a good idea to suggest colorset 0 *or* 32 for FvwmScrollColorset? > > > Colorset 22: FvwmConsole > > Don't you like it to be the same color as a root term? :) > I prefer a specific color, it can be the root colorset in some color themes :) > > Colorset 23: dynamic colorset (a colorset that can change during use > > without affecting the whole look, e.g., for FvwmScript-ColorsetBrowser) > > Ok, temporary colorset. But should it belong to module colorsets? > > > Colorset 24 to 25: reserved for modules themes > > > > Colorset 26 to 29: reserved for future use > > > > * Applications colorsets (Form and Script are here!) > > > > Colorset 30: default (text) colorset for terminal like application > > (E.g., xterm in our menu) > > > > Colorset 31: (text) colorset for remote shell/applications > > > > Colorset 32: (text) root colorset > > We need a special term colorset (current 22), we use it in a special xterm > viewer windows (top/less/tail -f), I worry about it more than about a root > term colorset. Root term is not even that some people have, maybe to call > it admin term colorset and include FvwmConsole term in it? :) Anyway in > the future FvwmConsole will be FvwmCommand in xterm. > Yes but the future may be in a very long time ... > I think it is ok to have a separate colorset for special viewers and text > editors. The following was supposed to be should be 33, I think. > Yes, it is a good idea, but we may want to use a special colorset. Olivier |