|
From: Thomas A. <tho...@gm...> - 2008-03-25 01:42:33
|
On 10/03/2008, Mikhael Goikhman <mi...@ho...> wrote: > Now, the main question is whether we may only discuss things or actually > implement them too. OK. I hope I have this right, was a little hairy, so fingers crossed. I've pushed a series of commits to the fvwm-themes CVS repository on SF which is my first set of "phase 1" patches. These do nothing more than a sweep and clean through each theme, updating existing files for deprecated options, replacing those options with newer ones where necessary. This should alleviate any clutter in terms of deprecation warnings from FVWM. Based on FVWM 2.5.25 (and beyond.) Tomorrow's job will be a perl code review, as stated in this thread. Then I will look at making a list of options in current FVWM which fvwm-themes could benefit from using in some or all of its themes. It's 01:42am. I hope I've not buggered anything up. If so, do let me know. -- Thomas Adam |