Re: [Funk-devel] Building funk

[Ben K. <bk...@al...>]

Hello!


Unfortunately the SVN is currently in a bad state.  Elf has been moving from
the original version of the
raw-sockets egg to the new-and-improved version.

He has assured me that he will be checking in the rest of the new egg
sometime today.  The new egg will be called 'raw-sockets' as well.

What can you do in the meantime?

Rather than patching the old raw-sockets, you can always install raw-sockets
via the chicken repository.  We will only be submitting known-good versions
of our eggs to the chicken repository...

Try "chicken-setup raw-sockets", it should work.

Another, more important topic, is how to keep the SVN from being in a bad
state.

I have been (and will continue to be) very open with handing out SVN
accounts.  I would ask everyone with commit to please make sure that the
Makefiles still work at a minimum before checking anything in.

I will be adding a basic test script in the near future, and will be
automating more testing and validation as we go.



Thanks much!

- Ben Kurtz


On 9/24/07, Magnus Therning <ma...@th...> wrote:
>
> I didn't make it to CCC, again, but looking through the presentation
> funk stood out as something *really* cool.
>
> I just downloaded it from SVN and tried building it.  I failed :(
>
> Here are some initial observations:
>
> - Several files in the SVN repo are automatically generated by
>    autotools.  It's generally a bad thing to include those.  It's better
>    to assume that people who want to build bleeding edge know how to run
>    'autoreconf'.
>
> - There is a bit of a mixed use of automake and manual make files.
>    It'd probably improve accessibility to do one or the other.
>
> - The build fails since recent changes haven't been reflected in the
>    build structure (renaming of raw-sockets and introducing rawsock).
>
> I'd be happy to contribute a diff that removes the automatically
> generated files.  I might even find the time to remove the manually
> written makefiles and replace them with automakefiles.
>
> I've attached a small patch for src/eggs/Makefile.  Am I correct in my
> assumptions there?
>
> In the meantime please check in the Makefile for rawsock.
>
> /M
>
> --
> Magnus Therning                             (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
> magnus＠therning．org             Jabber: magnus．therning＠gmail．com
> http://therning.org/magnus
>
> C++ is history repeated as tragedy. Java is history repeated as farce.
>      -- Scott McKay
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Funk-devel mailing list
> Fun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/funk-devel
>
>
>