From: Luke O. <lu...@me...> - 2003-03-30 05:44:55
|
Yes, we've made similar modifications to get true/false values, so I'd appreciate them in cvs and the next release. :) - Luke Quoting Edmund Lian <el...@in...>: > > Gee, I forgot that this mailing list exists... should have just posted the > following here, rather than the Webware list a few days ago... > > I've hacked MultiCheckboxField and CheckboxField to properly support the > static and hide options. Static multi and single checkbox fields actually > appear as greyed-out checkboxes, etc. I had to modify SimpleHTMLGen a > little to support these changes. The change is that the html function is > now able to generate valueless tags like "disabled". > > In addition, I've modified CheckboxField to return 1 and 0 (true and false) > rather than "on" and 0, to be consistent with both documentation and > expectations. > > These are relatively largish changes that will break code that depends on > getting "on" and 0 from CheckboxFields, so I'm not sure if I should check > them into CVS. > > What's the feeling? > > ...Edmund. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > _______________________________________________ > Funformkit-discuss mailing list > Fun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/funformkit-discuss > |