Re: [ftm-devel] [ftm] Re: FTM External SDK 2.6 (Mac OS X)

[Norbert S. <Nor...@ir...>]

Wow, thanks a lot Stefano.
We will integrate the quotes into the script in a new version of the SDK.

On 05 Oct 2012, at 15:16, Stefano Fasciani wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I spend couple of days in trying to use the new 2.6 SDK and I have just succeeded in building and running the 3 example externals (coucou pack pingpong~), next week I will try to build my own ftm externals to verify wether the functionality it is still correct.
> 
> I like the 2.6 SDK better than the 2.5 because I think it's easier to keep a clean an neat folder tree organization since everything is packed in the ftm.mxo (headers and lib) and the built .mxo just need to stay in the same folder of the ftm.mxo which is easy and it also make a lot of sense! (I had problem with 2.5 when I wanted to place the built .mxo in the folder I want, because of the linking with the FTMframework… etc… etc… )

In fact, we didn't change anything essential.
Also the FTM framework had to be just next to the FTM externals just as now the ftm.mxo (in fact, we just packed the shared lib into an mxo bundle instead of a Mac OS X framework and added a Max class "ftm" to it).

The rest on the ftm-devel mailing-list...

Best
Norbert