Re: [Freemint-discuss] __M680x0__ macros in gcc 7 (was Re: [Freemint-list] Broken udelay() for m68000)

[Thorsten O. <ad...@th...>]

On Samstag, 21. April 2018 18:54:34 CEST David Gálvez wrote:
> I've noticed a variation of this issue, where there is a check for the

As for the unaligned_putl function: that seems to be only used in very few 
cases, and not in speed-critical code, so maybe that ifdef, and the check for 
odd address can be removed there completely, and just use always the safe 
code.

For the other cases, the check has to be changed.