|
From: Thorsten O. <ad...@th...> - 2018-02-23 05:00:39
|
On Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 19:29:06 CET Adam Klobukowski wrote: > It used to be true a long time ago it seems I don't think so. If you look at git log -p unix/chroot.c, the last change there is from 2001. And even that patch didn't change much, there is nothing that indicates that mintlib manages the root directory itself. Wouldn't make much sense anyway, since every program would still be able to get out of the jail by using the GEMDOS calls directly. >It also seems that Dchroot() seems to be very incomplete. Thats more likely the problem. For example, when chrooted, pathnames with drive letters shouldn't be allowed (except maybe u:). PS.: pls send discussions to the list, otherwise ppl. wonder what we are talking about ;) |