|
From: Peter S. <p....@sc...> - 2018-05-01 19:49:37
|
Is there a newer version of binutils available anywhere ? # GNU nm (GNU Binutils for MiNT 20130327) 2.23.2 I can only see source code on github. Peter |
|
From: Miro K. <mir...@gm...> - 2018-05-02 00:28:56
|
On 2 May 2018 at 03:49, Peter Slegg <p....@sc...> wrote: > > Is there a newer version of binutils available anywhere ? > > # GNU nm (GNU Binutils for MiNT 20130327) 2.23.2 > > I can only see source code on github. > If you mean a native Atari build, my website offers 2.26. -- MiKRO / Mystic Bytes http://mikro.atari.org |
|
From: Thorsten O. <ad...@th...> - 2018-05-02 06:30:24
|
On Dienstag, 1. Mai 2018 21:49:08 CEST Peter Slegg wrote: > Is there a newer version of binutils available anywhere ? Yes, binutils 2.30 is available at my page precompiled for the major OSes (linux/Win32/cygwin/macOS) |
|
From: Peter S. <p....@sc...> - 2018-05-02 16:28:20
|
On Wed, 02 May 2018 08:30:12 , Thorsten Otto <ad...@th...> wrote: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > >On Dienstag, 1. Mai 2018 21:49:08 CEST Peter Slegg wrote: >> Is there a newer version of binutils available anywhere ? >Yes, binutils 2.30 is available at my page precompiled for the major OSes >(linux/Win32/cygwin/macOS) Native ones ? Peter |
|
From: Thorsten O. <ad...@th...> - 2018-05-03 07:05:34
|
On Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2018 18:28:10 CEST Peter Slegg wrote: > Native ones ? There are native versions for 2.29.1, but they don't appear on the links page: http://tho-otto.de/download/mint/binutils-2.29.1-mint-000.tar.xz http://tho-otto.de/download/mint/binutils-2.29.1-mint-020.tar.xz http://tho-otto.de/download/mint/binutils-2.29.1-mint-v4e.tar.xz PS.: does SF has problems again? my mail took 2 days to arrive |
|
From: Peter S. <p....@sc...> - 2018-05-04 19:41:48
|
On Thu, 03 May 2018 09:05:21 , Thorsten Otto <ad...@th...> wrote: > On Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2018 18:28:10 CEST Peter Slegg wrote: > > Native ones ? > > There are native versions for 2.29.1, but they don't appear on the links page: > > http://tho-otto.de/download/mint/binutils-2.29.1-mint-000.tar.xz > http://tho-otto.de/download/mint/binutils-2.29.1-mint-020.tar.xz > http://tho-otto.de/download/mint/binutils-2.29.1-mint-v4e.tar.xz > > Thanks. 020 versions installed but I removed some of the links and renamed the m68k files. I suspect this is because you were aiming at cross-compiling. I may try to create an rpm. Peter |
|
From: Thorsten O. <ad...@th...> - 2018-05-04 21:02:42
|
On Freitag, 4. Mai 2018 21:41:36 CEST Peter Slegg wrote: > I suspect this is because you were aiming at > cross-compiling. Yes, i used a slightly modified version of the script that i also use for cross-compiling. The native versions where just a try, i stopped working on it when i had a somewhat lengthy discussion with mirko, and we couldn't decide wether the '020 compiler should also produce '020 executables by default, because that would require a different lib directory layout for the '000 and the '020 version. BTW do you have some specific need of newer features that aren't supported by older versions, or just wanted to have a "recent" version? |
|
From: Peter S. <p....@sc...> - 2018-05-05 09:15:22
|
On Fri, 04 May 2018 23:02:30 , Thorsten Otto <ad...@th...> wrote: > On Freitag, 4. Mai 2018 21:41:36 CEST Peter Slegg wrote: > > I suspect this is because you were aiming at > > cross-compiling. > > Yes, i used a slightly modified version of the script that i also use for > cross-compiling. The native versions where just a try, i stopped working on it > when i had a somewhat lengthy discussion with mirko, and we couldn't decide > wether the '020 compiler should also produce '020 executables by default, > because that would require a different lib directory layout for the '000 and > the '020 version. > > BTW do you have some specific need of newer features that aren't supported by > older versions, or just wanted to have a "recent" version? > > No great need for new features but with the elf discussion I looked at my binutils and saw how old they were. I like to keep things updated if I can. Also, if the migration to elf begins, I might try to help with some testing. Regards, Peter |
|
From: Thorsten O. <ad...@th...> - 2018-05-05 09:32:04
|
On Samstag, 5. Mai 2018 11:15:08 CEST Peter Slegg wrote: > Also, if the migration to elf begins, did i miss anything? Sure, 2.30 is maybe the last official version with support for m68k+a.out, but as for now there is no urgent need to switch to elf. Also, i have already patches here to add back in that support. |
|
From: Peter S. <p....@sc...> - 2018-05-05 21:58:58
|
On Sat, 05 May 2018 11:31:54 , Thorsten Otto <ad...@th...> wrote: > On Samstag, 5. Mai 2018 11:15:08 CEST Peter Slegg wrote: > > Also, if the migration to elf begins, > > did i miss anything? :-) I think it might happen eventually. > Sure, 2.30 is maybe the last official version with > support for m68k+a.out, but as for now there is no urgent need to switch to > elf. Also, i have already patches here to add back in that support. Is there any risk of losing a.out support elsewhere ? Peter |
|
From: Thorsten O. <ad...@th...> - 2018-05-06 06:33:02
|
On Samstag, 5. Mai 2018 23:58:52 CEST Peter Slegg wrote: > Is there any risk of losing a.out support elsewhere ? I don't hope so. If that happens, a.out might be removed completely. |