freemind-developer

[Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Dan P. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi team, especially Chris and Dimitry,

I wonder whether we should create a bug-fix release of FreeMind 0.8.0,
numbered 0.8.1. The main issue to be fixed would be the one with the program
not working on Java 1.6.0. If other issues occur to you that you deem should
urgently be fixed in that release, these can be fixed too.

Importantly, though, any bug fixes of 0.8.0 should be done carefully,
avoiding the introduction of new bugs.

One reason for this proposal is that we are yet far away from the
0.9.0final release, at least three months by my estimation.

What do you think of this proposal? Chris? Dimitry?

Best regards,
Dan

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Ray B. <ray...@co...>]

I think this is a good idea. It will show users that we aren't standing 
still.

Ray

Dan Polansky wrote:
> Hi team, especially Chris and Dimitry,
>
> I wonder whether we should create a bug-fix release of FreeMind 0.8.0, 
> numbered 0.8.1. The main issue to be fixed would be the one with the 
> program not working on Java 1.6.0. If other issues occur to you that 
> you deem should urgently be fixed in that release, these can be fixed 
> too.
>
> Importantly, though, any bug fixes of 0.8.0 should be done carefully, 
> avoiding the introduction of new bugs.
>
> One reason for this proposal is that we are yet far away from the 
> 0.9.0 final release, at least three months by my estimation.
>
> What do you think of this proposal? Chris? Dimitry?
>
> Best regards,
> Dan
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services
> for just about anything Open Source.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> Fre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>   

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

Hello Dan,

> I wonder whether we should create a bug-fix release of FreeMind 0.8.0, 
> numbered 0.8.1. The main issue to be fixed would be the one with the 
> program not working on Java 1.6.0. 

I think that the bugs around the Java 1.6.0  can be fixed relatively 
easy. I am aware only about two problem places: in the preferences 
dialog and in the encrypted nodes / maps. So if you want to test it, I 
could implement the fix.

Further I am afraid that the "three months" are too optimistic forecast 
because Chris never has time, neither for the bug fixes nor for 
meetings, chats or talks. This way nobody can help him to solve his issues.

Dimitry

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Ray B. <ray...@co...>]

If Chris is a bottleneck, we need to find ways to make it easier for 
him. Chris, if you have suggestions as to how we can help you, please 
speak up. Perhaps there is some work you can parcel out?

I think that the use of a tool like Crucible might help in working with 
Chris. It would allow you to discuss code asynchronously, like using 
email, rather than IM. I don't know if Crucible is the right tool. My 
wife has decided against it and is trying another that is similar. I'll 
try to get the info on it from her tomorrow. She felt that Crucible was 
too resource intensive, but liked the basic idea enough to review all 
the other such tools she could find.

Thanks,
  Ray

Dimitry Polivaev wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
>   
>> I wonder whether we should create a bug-fix release of FreeMind 0.8.0, 
>> numbered 0.8.1. The main issue to be fixed would be the one with the 
>> program not working on Java 1.6.0. 
>>     
>
> I think that the bugs around the Java 1.6.0  can be fixed relatively 
> easy. I am aware only about two problem places: in the preferences 
> dialog and in the encrypted nodes / maps. So if you want to test it, I 
> could implement the fix.
>
> Further I am afraid that the "three months" are too optimistic forecast 
> because Chris never has time, neither for the bug fixes nor for 
> meetings, chats or talks. This way nobody can help him to solve his issues.
>
> Dimitry
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services
> for just about anything Open Source.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> Fre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>
>   

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

Hi,

> I think that the use of a tool like Crucible might help in working with 
> Chris. It would allow you to discuss code asynchronously, like using 
> email, rather than IM. I don't know if Crucible is the right tool.

I am not sure whether the tool supporting code reviews can assist for 
general discussions of design: the code is just another detail level.

I would like to have a good uml tool supporting reverse engineering 
(creating uml diagrams from code), but omondo UML eclipse plug-in is not 
stable (I have tried it, it has refused to draw inheritance arrows and 
has produced many exceptions and so on) and all other tools I know are 
not free.

Any ideas?

Dimitry

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Ray B. <ray...@co...>]

I'm not as familiar with the UML tools. If we can't find an open source 
tool, we might be able to get one of the proprietary tool companies to 
give us a license, since we're open source. A lot of companies do that, 
since the understand that the programmers who work on open source are 
usually professional programmers, and that those involved in open source 
are usually influential in the companies where they work.

Ray

P.S.: I'll do some looking today.

Dimitry Polivaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
>   
>> I think that the use of a tool like Crucible might help in working with 
>> Chris. It would allow you to discuss code asynchronously, like using 
>> email, rather than IM. I don't know if Crucible is the right tool.
>>     
>
> I am not sure whether the tool supporting code reviews can assist for 
> general discussions of design: the code is just another detail level.
>
> I would like to have a good uml tool supporting reverse engineering 
> (creating uml diagrams from code), but omondo UML eclipse plug-in is not 
> stable (I have tried it, it has refused to draw inheritance arrows and 
> has produced many exceptions and so on) and all other tools I know are 
> not free.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Dimitry
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services
> for just about anything Open Source.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> Fre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>
>   

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Christian F. <chr...@gm...>]

Hi,

correct, I asked for example the company that created the "Enterprise Architect" if they would give us such a license and they would, but at the end I noticed, that this tool is only available for windows which is of no help for me. Perhaps this info is useful for anybody,

Chris
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:39:14 -0500
> Von: Ray Benjamin <ray...@co...>
> An: fre...@li...
> Betreff: Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

> 
> I'm not as familiar with the UML tools. If we can't find an open source 
> tool, we might be able to get one of the proprietary tool companies to 
> give us a license, since we're open source. A lot of companies do that, 
> since the understand that the programmers who work on open source are 
> usually professional programmers, and that those involved in open source 
> are usually influential in the companies where they work.
> 
> Ray
> 
> P.S.: I'll do some looking today.
> 
> Dimitry Polivaev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >   
> >> I think that the use of a tool like Crucible might help in working with
> >> Chris. It would allow you to discuss code asynchronously, like using 
> >> email, rather than IM. I don't know if Crucible is the right tool.
> >>     
> >
> > I am not sure whether the tool supporting code reviews can assist for 
> > general discussions of design: the code is just another detail level.
> >
> > I would like to have a good uml tool supporting reverse engineering 
> > (creating uml diagrams from code), but omondo UML eclipse plug-in is not
> > stable (I have tried it, it has refused to draw inheritance arrows and 
> > has produced many exceptions and so on) and all other tools I know are 
> > not free.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Dimitry
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> > It's the best place to buy or sell services
> > for just about anything Open Source.
> >
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freemind-developer mailing list
> > Fre...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
> >
> >   
> 

-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger?did=10

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Dan P. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi,
coming back to the topic of this thread, which is "Proposal: bug-fix release
of 0.8.0: 0.8.1": any more reactions? Chris?
Dan

[Freemind-developer] Enterprise Architect

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

Christian Foltin:
 > I asked for example the company that created the "Enterprise
 > Architect" if they would give us such a license and they would, but
 > at the end I noticed, that this tool is only available for windows
 > which is of no help for me. Perhaps this info is useful for anybody,

Hi Chris,

I would be happy to have a license of the "Enterprise Architect". I have 
download a trial and it works excellent. It brings all I need to work on 
the design. What should I do to obtain the license you have been promised?

I have also found that there is a linux version of the program available.

Dimitry

http://www.sparxsystems.de/default.asp?nav=3x110&lid=29

> Systemvoraussetzungen und -anforderungen von Enterprise Architect
> 
> Windows Version 
> 
>     * Intel® Pentium® Processor (oder besser)
>     * Microsoft® Windows 98 SE, Windows Millennium, Windows NT® 4.0 mit Service Pack 5, Windows 2000, Windows XP oder Windows 2003  
>     * RAM hängt vom verwendeten Betriebsystems ab - 32 MB für Win98 SE, 64MB für NT und 2000, 128 Mb für XP (mehr RAM erhöht die Performance)  
>     * 45 MB freien Festplattenspeicher
>     * 1024x768 (oder höher) Auflösung empfohlen - 800x600 mindestens, 640x480 ist zu wenig
> 
> Linux Version 
> 
>     * Intel® Pentium II® processor (oder equivalent) 
>     * CodeWeavers' CrossoverOffice 2.1.0 (oder höher), Microsoft DCOM95, Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, Microsoft Data Access Components 2.8 (MDAC) 
>     * Linux Operating System (getestet mit Kernel 2.4) 
>     * RAM 32 MB Minimum, 128 MB für gute Performance, (wie bei Windows - mehr RAM erhöht die Performance)
>     * 45 MB freien Festplattenspeicher
>     * 1024x768 (oder höher) Auflösung empfohlen - 800x600 mindestens, 640x480 ist zu wenig

Re: [Freemind-developer] Enterprise Architect

[Christian F. (GMX) <chr...@gm...>]

Dear Dimitry,

ok the linux version works only with a commercial add on, which I don't
want to buy (the CrossoverOffice part below).

I'll forward you the conversation with them in a separate mail.

Regards, Chris

Dimitry Polivaev schrieb:
> Christian Foltin:
>  > I asked for example the company that created the "Enterprise
>  > Architect" if they would give us such a license and they would, but
>  > at the end I noticed, that this tool is only available for windows
>  > which is of no help for me. Perhaps this info is useful for anybody,
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I would be happy to have a license of the "Enterprise Architect". I have 
> download a trial and it works excellent. It brings all I need to work on 
> the design. What should I do to obtain the license you have been promised?
>
> I have also found that there is a linux version of the program available.
>
> Dimitry
>
> http://www.sparxsystems.de/default.asp?nav=3x110&lid=29
>
>   
>> Systemvoraussetzungen und -anforderungen von Enterprise Architect
>>
>> Windows Version 
>>
>>     * Intel® Pentium® Processor (oder besser)
>>     * Microsoft® Windows 98 SE, Windows Millennium, Windows NT® 4.0 mit Service Pack 5, Windows 2000, Windows XP oder Windows 2003  
>>     * RAM hängt vom verwendeten Betriebsystems ab - 32 MB für Win98 SE, 64MB für NT und 2000, 128 Mb für XP (mehr RAM erhöht die Performance)  
>>     * 45 MB freien Festplattenspeicher
>>     * 1024x768 (oder höher) Auflösung empfohlen - 800x600 mindestens, 640x480 ist zu wenig
>>
>> Linux Version 
>>
>>     * Intel® Pentium II® processor (oder equivalent) 
>>     * CodeWeavers' CrossoverOffice 2.1.0 (oder höher), Microsoft DCOM95, Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, Microsoft Data Access Components 2.8 (MDAC) 
>>     * Linux Operating System (getestet mit Kernel 2.4) 
>>     * RAM 32 MB Minimum, 128 MB für gute Performance, (wie bei Windows - mehr RAM erhöht die Performance)
>>     * 45 MB freien Festplattenspeicher
>>     * 1024x768 (oder höher) Auflösung empfohlen - 800x600 mindestens, 640x480 ist zu wenig
>>     
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> Fre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>
>   

[Freemind-developer] Sponsored programs

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

Hello Dan,

the company that created the "Enterprise Architect" has offered us two
licenses for free provided that we mention them as our sponsor. Because
we already use the sponsored yourkit java profiler and have a need of
some other programs, I propose that I do the following:

1. Create new protected wiki page "Development tools used by freemind"

with content

* YourKit Java Profiler sponsored by [http://www.yourkit.com yourkit]
for analysis of memory consumption and performance issues,
* Enterprise Architect sponsored by [http://www.sparxsystems.eu/
sparxsystems] for design issues,

2. Replace the section

http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page#Tools

by the link th this page

Christian writes that he can not run enterprise architect on linux
without CrossOver Linux created by
http://www.codeweavers.com/products/cxoffice/

I have found the following statement on their page and I think that they
could become the third company sponsoring us a program license:

> CodeWeavers strongly believes in the power of open-source solutions
> to help deliver critically needed software at reasonable prices to
> educational institutions worldwide. For information on educational
> discounts please email our sales department.

How do you think?

Best regards,
Dimitry

Re: [Freemind-developer] Sponsored programs

[Dan P. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi Dimitry,

Topic 1: creation of a dedicated page for tools used by FreeMind team. I
would prefer not creating a dedicated page for tools used by FreeMind,
unless the number of elements in the subsection Tools of Authors and
contributors exceeds say 7. In any case, 2 or 3 items should be accomodable
by a section on the main page. Also, I suppose that the providers of the
tools would prefer placement of their tools on the main page of FreeMind.

Topic 2: use of Enterprise Architect. I come to this topic in its dedicated
thread, keeping the topic 1 the topic of this thread.

Best regards,
Dan

Links:
http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Re: [Freemind-developer] Sponsored programs

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

> Topic 1: creation of a dedicated page for tools used by FreeMind team. I 
> would prefer not creating a dedicated page for tools used by FreeMind, 
> unless the number of elements in the subsection Tools of Authors and 
> contributors exceeds say 7. 

I do not see the relevance of the tools for the list of Authors and 
Contributors, I would like to create a special page dedicated to the 
tools instead.

> In any case, 2 or 3 items should be 
> accomodable by a section on the main page. Also, I suppose that the 
> providers of the tools would prefer placement of their tools on the main 
> page of FreeMind.

The tools provider would pr3fer it, but such solution limits the number 
of the referenced tools and potentially makes equal treatment of 
different tool providers not possible. Further I think that this 
information is of no interest for the most consumer of the main page.

So let me repeat my proposal of creating a separate page, linking to it 
from all relevant places and removing the tool list from every other 
place where it does not belong to.

Best regards, Dimitry

Re: [Freemind-developer] Sponsored programs

[Ray B. <ray...@co...>]

At the least, we should provide acknowledgement and thanks to any tool 
vendors who have donated licenses to us, and that should be done on the 
front page. Details could be handled elsewhere.

Most people on the web hate scrolling, so it's best to have the most 
important and most relevant information on the first screen of the first 
page and provide good navigation. I prefer simplicity, in general, but 
that's a personal preference.

Ray

Dimitry Polivaev wrote:
>> Topic 1: creation of a dedicated page for tools used by FreeMind team. I 
>> would prefer not creating a dedicated page for tools used by FreeMind, 
>> unless the number of elements in the subsection Tools of Authors and 
>> contributors exceeds say 7. 
>>     
>
> I do not see the relevance of the tools for the list of Authors and 
> Contributors, I would like to create a special page dedicated to the 
> tools instead.
>
>   
>> In any case, 2 or 3 items should be 
>> accomodable by a section on the main page. Also, I suppose that the 
>> providers of the tools would prefer placement of their tools on the main 
>> page of FreeMind.
>>     
>
> The tools provider would pr3fer it, but such solution limits the number 
> of the referenced tools and potentially makes equal treatment of 
> different tool providers not possible. Further I think that this 
> information is of no interest for the most consumer of the main page.
>
> So let me repeat my proposal of creating a separate page, linking to it 
> from all relevant places and removing the tool list from every other 
> place where it does not belong to.
>
> Best regards, Dimitry
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> Fre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>
>   

Re: [Freemind-developer] Sponsored programs

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

Ray,

 > At the least, we should provide acknowledgement and thanks to any tool
> vendors who have donated licenses to us, and that should be done on
> the front page. Details could be handled elsewhere.
> 
> Most people on the web hate scrolling, so it's best to have the most 
> important and most relevant information on the first screen of the
> first page and provide good navigation. I prefer simplicity, in
 > general, but that's a personal preference.

I do not understand what you mean. Currently we have quite a long main 
page. Should it be reworked? What information could be removed? Who 
should do it? When? Should Dan who is an author of the current main page 
take part? In what sense? What do you understand under "acknowledgment" 
and "details"? Should every single donated license be mentioned on the 
main page? What about my initial proposal

> * YourKit Java Profiler sponsored by [http://www.yourkit.com yourkit]
> for analysis of memory consumption and performance issues,
> * Enterprise Architect sponsored by [http://www.sparxsystems.eu/
> sparxsystems] for design issues,

is it "detailed" enough? What wording would you recommend?

Dimitry

Re: [Freemind-developer] Sponsored programs

[Ray B. <ray...@co...>]

Dimitry,

I think that, at some point, we should try to find someone really good 
at web page design, and have them redo our main page. There is a lot on 
it, right now, and the most important items aren't necessarily the 
easiest to find. If you look at the main web pages of other projects, 
you'll get a good idea of what I'm talking about.

When I first went to the FreeMind site, I wanted to find a few basic things:

1) A description of what FreeMind is and what it does.
2) How to download and install it. (Usually a button to a separate page.)
3) Documentation Link
4) Link to bug reporting.
5) What's the current version?
6) Is it open source, shareware, or what?

Past that, it's good to have recent news regarding the project, but keep 
it to a single page, if possible.

Some good examples: Netbeans, Firefox.com, openoffice.org.

Ray

Dimitry Polivaev wrote:
> Ray,
>
>  > At the least, we should provide acknowledgement and thanks to any tool
>   
>> vendors who have donated licenses to us, and that should be done on
>> the front page. Details could be handled elsewhere.
>>
>> Most people on the web hate scrolling, so it's best to have the most 
>> important and most relevant information on the first screen of the
>> first page and provide good navigation. I prefer simplicity, in
>>     
>  > general, but that's a personal preference.
>
> I do not understand what you mean. Currently we have quite a long main 
> page. Should it be reworked? What information could be removed? Who 
> should do it? When? Should Dan who is an author of the current main page 
> take part? In what sense? What do you understand under "acknowledgment" 
> and "details"? Should every single donated license be mentioned on the 
> main page? What about my initial proposal
>
>   
>> * YourKit Java Profiler sponsored by [http://www.yourkit.com yourkit]
>> for analysis of memory consumption and performance issues,
>> * Enterprise Architect sponsored by [http://www.sparxsystems.eu/
>> sparxsystems] for design issues,
>>     
>
> is it "detailed" enough? What wording would you recommend?
>
> Dimitry
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> Fre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>
>   

Re: [Freemind-developer] Enterprise Architect

[Eric L. <fre...@zo...>]

Hi,

Christian Foltin (GMX) wrote:
> Dear Dimitry,
>
> ok the linux version works only with a commercial add on, which I 
> don't want to buy (the CrossoverOffice part below).
The requirements on the CrossOver version are pretty old (current is 
version 6.x), hence it might even work with Wine, but it wouldn't be 
supported, of course.

For my part, I would kindly request that all effort is done that such 
un-free software is not made a default part of the build process. Else I 
care less.

Thanks, Eric

>
>>> Linux Version 
>>>
>>>     * Intel® Pentium II® processor (oder equivalent) 
>>>     * CodeWeavers' CrossoverOffice 2.1.0 (oder höher), Microsoft DCOM95, Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, Microsoft Data Access Components 2.8 (MDAC) 
>>>     * Linux Operating System (getestet mit Kernel 2.4) 
>>>     * RAM 32 MB Minimum, 128 MB für gute Performance, (wie bei Windows - mehr RAM erhöht die Performance)
>>>     * 45 MB freien Festplattenspeicher
>>>     * 1024x768 (oder höher) Auflösung empfohlen - 800x600 mindestens, 640x480 ist zu wenig
>>>       

Re: [Freemind-developer] Enterprise Architect

[Dan P. <dan...@gm...>]

Hello Dimitry,

I suppose the topic of this thread "Enterprise Architect" is "The use of
Enterprise Architect by FreeMind team". It is this supposed topic that I
will deal with in the following.

What worries me a bit is that there are only two licenses available for
FreeMind project. If, say, you and Chris start using the tool, no one else
will be able to use it too, which creates a privilege for certain members of
FreeMind team, not shared by the whole team. I am far from sure that I like
this, and that I see this as acceptable.

Regards,
Dan

Re: [Freemind-developer] Enterprise Architect

[Dan P. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi Dimitry,

based on the facts that

   1. we already have only two licenses for the profiler,
   2. Enterprise Architect will not become a part of the build process,
   3. probably only you will use Enterprise Architect to reverse engineer
   FreeMind and to propose you design ideas

I agree that you add a credit to Enterprise Architect to the main page of
FreeMind wiki, under the section "Tools", next to the profiler. I also agree
that you get those two licenses from the provider of Enterprise Architect in
the name of FreeMind project.

Best regards,
Dan

Re: [Freemind-developer] Enterprise Architect

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

> I agree that you add a credit to Enterprise Architect to the main page 
> of FreeMind wiki, under the section "Tools", next to the profiler. I 
> also agree that you get those two licenses from the provider of 
> Enterprise Architect in the name of FreeMind project.

I have got two license keys for Enterprise Architect today. They can be 
used for both windows and linux versions of the program, the linux 
versions requires however cross over office.

Dimitry

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Christian F. (GMX) <chr...@gm...>]

I like it. Who takes care to create it?

Chris

Dan Polansky schrieb:
> Hi team, especially Chris and Dimitry,
>
> I wonder whether we should create a bug-fix release of FreeMind 0.8.0,
> numbered 0.8.1. The main issue to be fixed would be the one with the
> program not working on Java 1.6.0. If other issues occur to you that
> you deem should urgently be fixed in that release, these can be fixed
> too.
>
> Importantly, though, any bug fixes of 0.8.0 should be done carefully,
> avoiding the introduction of new bugs.
>
> One reason for this proposal is that we are yet far away from the
> 0.9.0 final release, at least three months by my estimation.
>
> What do you think of this proposal? Chris? Dimitry?
>
> Best regards,
> Dan
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services
> for just about anything Open Source.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freemind-developer mailing list
> Fre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
>   

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1 : Request for a chat.

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

Hello Chris, Dan, Eric and  Ray,

I think that we could have a chat in order to distribute current tasks 
between me and Chris. Currently almost all bugs are assigned to him, but 
it seems that nobody knows anything about his plans. Chris has resigned 
communicating of his plans and visions until now. It makes not only 
release planning impossible, it also disables me to take parts of his 
tasks on.

In this chat we could go through the list of the remaining bugs, discuss 
possible solutions and define who implements them. We could also decide 
who implements the fixes of 0.8.0 .

Best regards, Dimitry

Christian Foltin (GMX) schrieb:
> I like it. Who takes care to create it?
> 
> Chris
> 

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Dan P. <dan...@gm...>]

Hi Dimitry and others,

now that Chris and Dimitry agree with the idea of publishing a bug-fix
release 0.8.1, to get things started:

Could you, Dimitry, please create a new CVS branch for 0.8.1, based on the
branch for 0.8.0, and perform the bug fixes of the bugs related to Java
1.6.0 there? After doing it, could you please send as an answer to this
email a list of classes modified in 0.8.1, ideally with hyperlinks to the
CVS? That would be great.

For context: From what I have understood, there are two areas needing a
bug-fix:
1. The preferences dialog
2. The encryption of nodes and maps

Best regards,
Dan

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

Hello,
> Could you, Dimitry, please create a new CVS branch for 0.8.1, based on 
> the branch for 0.8.0, and perform the bug fixes of the bugs related to 
> Java 1.6.0 there? After doing it, could you please send as an answer to 
> this email a list of classes modified in 0.8.1, ideally with hyperlinks 
> to the CVS? That would be great.

Done. Changed files:

Preferences Dialog:
Checking in freemind/controller/Controller.java;

Encryption:
Checking in freemind/modes/mindmapmode/EncryptedMindMapNode.java;

Removing test output:
Checking in freemind/main/Tools.java;

Version number:
Checking in freemind/main/FreeMind.java;
Checking in freemind/main/FreeMindApplet.java;

Checking in history.txt;

The new branch name in CVS : fm-0-8-1 (convention: tag names are 
capitalized, the branche names are not )

Dimitry

Re: [Freemind-developer] Proposal: bug-fix release of 0.8.0: 0.8.1

[Dan P. <dan...@gm...>]

Hello Dimitry,

thanks a lot. I see that the changes you have done to the code are really
small and easy to control. They are:

In freemind/controller/Controller.java:
- dialog.setDefaultCloseOperation(WindowConstants.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
+ dialog.setDefaultCloseOperation(WindowConstants.DISPOSE_ON_CLOSE);

In EncryptedMindMapNode.java:
- "PBEWithMD5AndTripleDES").generateSecret(keySpec);
+ "PBEWithMD5AndDES").generateSecret(keySpec);

In Tools.java:
- System.out.println("old String: '" + string + "'");

I am omitting the changes of version numbers in FreeMind.java and
FreeMindApplet.java.

Thanks a lot again.

Regards,
Dan