Is there any current plans to upgrade dependancies to stable releases: we are very behind in versions for a lot of these?
LibPNG, LibJPEG, OpenEXR, LibTIFF4, LibOpenJPEG, LibWebP, ZLib
Is there any current plan to support C++17 and new standards, at least compiling with the flag
I have patched a version of 3.18.0 to basically support this however I had to remove the very outdated OpenEXR and some elements of ILM's code
I had the same issues with 3.18.0. I commented out all the throws where the compiler complained about and I replaced auto_ptr with shared_ptr. For the last one, you have to do a workaround for the old release calls of auto_ptr. After this, you can compile the code with C++17.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hi Dan! I've coincidentally also been working on updating the version of OpenEXR FreeImage uses, and have put together a patch updating it to OpenEXR 3.1.3 in patch 151 - maybe this could help? Thanks!
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Yeah we really need to get FreeImage 4.0 going as we are the building block for so many Engines / Unreal / Unity / openFrameworks https://freeimage.sourceforge.io/users.html and there are a lot of CVE's in the old dependancies here that have been patched externally that need inclusion in the next version pronto else
I'm with you and will try to support a new version 4.0 of FreeImage. Although I've been contributing some small new features to the library written in C/C++, my main focus was always on the VB6 wrapper (as well on the C# .NET wrapper, as long as C# was an option in my software company).
However, I'm still here and willing to help with new versions and the VB6 wrapper, at least.
BTW, for my mind, FreeImage version 4.0 should be hosted on an official GitHub repository and not longer on SF.
Carsten
👍
1
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hi FreeImage Devs,
Is there any current plans to upgrade dependancies to stable releases: we are very behind in versions for a lot of these?
LibPNG, LibJPEG, OpenEXR, LibTIFF4, LibOpenJPEG, LibWebP, ZLib
Is there any current plan to support C++17 and new standards, at least compiling with the flag
I have patched a version of 3.18.0 to basically support this however I had to remove the very outdated OpenEXR and some elements of ILM's code
https://github.com/danoli3/FreeImage/tree/3.18.0_cpp17
Kind Regards,
Dan
These are the kinds of errors when trying to compile 3.18.0 with new standards
I had the same issues with 3.18.0. I commented out all the throws where the compiler complained about and I replaced auto_ptr with shared_ptr. For the last one, you have to do a workaround for the old release calls of auto_ptr. After this, you can compile the code with C++17.
Hi Dan! I've coincidentally also been working on updating the version of OpenEXR FreeImage uses, and have put together a patch updating it to OpenEXR 3.1.3 in patch 151 - maybe this could help? Thanks!
Awesome Neil!
Yeah we really need to get FreeImage 4.0 going as we are the building block for so many Engines / Unreal / Unity / openFrameworks https://freeimage.sourceforge.io/users.html and there are a lot of CVE's in the old dependancies here that have been patched externally that need inclusion in the next version pronto else
Very Quick Audit of FreeImage 3.18.0 ...
LibPNG (1.6.16) : CVE-2019-7317, CVE-2018-14048, CVE-2018-14550
LibTIFF (4.0.4) : CVE-2011-0192, CVE-2019-14973, CVE-2019-14973, CVE-2018-19210, CVE-2018-18661, CVE-2018-10779
LibRaw (0.17.a1), CVE-2020-15503, CVE-2018-20363, CVE-2018-20364, CVE-2018-20365, CVE-2017-14348, CVE-2017-13735, CVE-2017-14265
LibWebP (0.4.2), CVE-2018-25012, CVE-2020-36328
OpenEXR (2.2.0). CVE-2021-20296, CVE-2021-3479, CVE-2021-3478
Cornerstone of the industry right here, summon core FreeImage Devs
@cklein05 @drolon @noescom @detlevv @ark42
Hi there,
I'm with you and will try to support a new version 4.0 of FreeImage. Although I've been contributing some small new features to the library written in C/C++, my main focus was always on the VB6 wrapper (as well on the C# .NET wrapper, as long as C# was an option in my software company).
However, I'm still here and willing to help with new versions and the VB6 wrapper, at least.
BTW, for my mind, FreeImage version 4.0 should be hosted on an official GitHub repository and not longer on SF.
Carsten
Updates ? GitHub Repo ? Status ? Strategies ??