From: Richard R. <sf...@ol...> - 2004-03-08 18:57:26
|
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:43:42AM -0600, Fay John F Contr AAC/WMG wrote: [...] > (3) I notice a new GLUT definition of "GLUT_OFFSCREEN". There was > considerable discussion while I was gone about offscreen rendering with t= he > upshot that there was some code in CVS that needed to get backed out. Did > that ever happen? [...] I've been too busy to think much about freeglut the past few weeks. The pointless arguing consumed all of the energy that I've had for freeglut. (Like any other explosive flame, it consumed available resources, and then some...) If Steve, as the sole dissesnter to the feature, is unwilling to do the trivial work to remove it, then I guess it will have to wait till I get around to it. I was planning on sometime this week. There is no hurry. It is the "next thing" on my freeglut plate. --=20 "I probably don't know what I'm talking about." http://www.olib.org/~rkr/ |