From: Fay J. F C. AAC/W. <joh...@eg...> - 2004-09-22 13:57:58
|
Richard, If I remember correctly, the changes to "freeglut_main.c" were the complete fix for the subwindow bug and were nothing but that fix. If you can change the comment on that change to that file by hand you should be in good shape. John F. Fay joh...@eg... 850-729-6330 -----Original Message----- From: fre...@li... [mailto:fre...@li...] On Behalf Of Richard Rauch Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 9:08 PM To: fre...@li... Subject: [Freeglut-developer] Recent freeglut changes. John, over on openglut-devel, you asked about this, I thought I'd save you the time by directly posting to freeglut-developer: freeglut_main.c was altered by one of the first 2 sets of commits that Brian did for you, in such a way as to (partially?) fix a subwindow bug in the library. I assumed that it was a complete fix and imported it with some changes to OpenGLUT. I meant to hold off committing to OpenGLUT until I had tested that the changes did what I thought, but I accidentally picked it up when I did a "cvs commit" where I meant "cvs commit <foo>". I didn't catch it until afterwards. So both repositories have this change slipped in without any commit log commenting on it. It seems to have fixed a standing issue that I had with some subwindows which spanned all of OpenGLUT's life and dated back to some time in freeglut. It was WIN32-specific. John, care to comment further? Was the change complete are there other parts? -- "I probably don't know what I'm talking about." http://www.olib.org/~rkr/ |
From: Fay J. F C. AAC/W. <joh...@eg...> - 2004-10-04 15:46:35
|
Richard, Thanks for your reply. I'm back after my week and a half off and have made a first pass through the stack of e-mails that waited for my return. (I am a most extraordinarily lucky man: I find that in my absence alone I won $1,600,000 from a lottery in the Netherlands and another $1,500,000 from another international lottery of unspecified location.) Now on my second pass I am starting to answer some of them. The question of the "shapes" demo is now in Steve Baker's lap. Steve, do you want to put the OpenGLUT "shapes" demo into the "freeglut" distribution instead of the existing "shapes" demo? It would be an improvement. The only licensing issue is that the OpenGLUT copyright would have to stay in the code. John F. Fay joh...@eg... 850-729-6330 -----Original Message----- From: fre...@li... [mailto:fre...@li...] On Behalf Of Richard Rauch Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 6:14 PM To: fre...@li... Subject: [Freeglut-developer] Recent freeglut changes. <snip> |