Re: [freeelks-devel] cloned vs twin

[Chris S. <ev...@mo...>]

I too prefer `twin' and have recently read ECMA.  I do not recall seeing
`twin' there.  I had been wondering about this and was wondering if I had
missed something (I need to read it several times more and read most but not
100%)?

Regards
Chris Saunders


-----Original Message-----
From: fre...@li...
[mailto:fre...@li...] On Behalf Of Emmanuel
Stapf [ES]
Sent: July-29-08 1:17 AM
To: 'Helmut Brandl'; fre...@li...
Subject: Re: [freeelks-devel] cloned vs twin

> I was wondering of what will be the final feature names for cloning. In
> FreeELKS I find the feature
> 
> twin: like Current
> 
> and in a working document for the ECMA specification I have found
> 
> cloned: like Current

This is expected. `twin' was the new name of `clone' formerly standardized
in ELKS
95. However it was changed to `cloned' in the ECMA standard. I definitely
favor
`twin' as I don't see a reason to switch to `cloned' for the time being. The
switch from `clone' to `twin' was already painful when it was done and still
a lot
of classes in the world are still using `clone'.

Regards,
Manu


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
freeelks-devel mailing list
fre...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freeelks-devel