From: Wilfried G. <roo...@un...> - 2008-11-07 23:45:41
|
Hy everyone, I'd like to introduce to you Philipp Kewisch from the mozilla/sunbird project. His first Commit is going to be related to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462990 Jedy, The original goal of freeassociation was to create a calendaring server, so there might be leftovers from that approach. Ah, and no need to CC this address, its subscribed to the list. Dan, Afaik there is no database description. Citadel for example stores ical elements as blobs, and keeps some abstracts in its mail specific way. Wilfried Goesgens |
From: Jedy W. <Jedy.Wang@Sun.COM> - 2008-11-10 03:14:16
|
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 18:45 -0500, Wilfried Goesgens wrote: > Jedy, The original goal of freeassociation was to create a calendaring > server, so there might be leftovers from that approach. Hi Wilfried, Is this still the goal of freeassociation? If not, is there a plan to remove the deprecated source? Regards, Jedy |
From: IGnatius T F. <roo...@un...> - 2008-11-10 03:46:45
|
>Is this still the goal of freeassociation? If not, is there a plan to >remove the deprecated source? There are definitely no longer any plans to implement a calendar server. That function has been well handled by several downstream projects. (In fact, you'd be hard pressed to find any non-Microsoft calendar server that *doesn't* use libical!) Removing the libicalcap/ directory has been discussed, but there are some concerns about side effects of doing so, such as breaking downstream projects that have ties into that directory for one reason or another. In particular, there are things in there that mention Evolution; we would hate to break the Evolution build at the same time that they're trying to unfork. -- Art |
From: Jedy W. <Jedy.Wang@Sun.COM> - 2008-11-10 08:06:20
|
Hi IGnatius, I found that libicalcap uses librr which is not shipped by Solaris. And I did a search using google and did not find much useful information. Do you know where can I find more information about this library? Thanks, Jedy On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 22:45 -0500, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: > Removing the libicalcap/ directory has been discussed, but there are > some > concerns about side effects of doing so, such as breaking downstream > projects that have ties into that directory for one reason or another. > In > particular, there are things in there that mention Evolution; we > would > hate to break the Evolution build at the same time that they're trying > to > unfork. |
From: IGnatius T F. <roo...@un...> - 2008-11-12 17:50:49
|
>I found that libicalcap uses librr which is not shipped by Solaris. And >I did a search using google and did not find much useful information. Do >you know where can I find more information about this library? Not a clue ... sorry -- Art |