From: Charles G. <cha...@gm...> - 2007-06-01 23:31:58
|
Ok I set up the mailing lists properly. Now any commits to subversion should be logged to for...@li... although you will need to subscribe to that one manually. Can we disable CVS? No point using two version control systems. (No objections to using SVN over CVS, right?) - C |
From: Jule S. <jsl...@gm...> - 2007-06-02 02:14:57
|
not at, much prefer SVN over CVS Jule On 6/1/07, Charles Goodwin <cha...@gm...> wrote: > > Ok I set up the mailing lists properly. Now any commits to subversion > should be logged to for...@li... although you > will need to subscribe to that one manually. > > Can we disable CVS? No point using two version control systems. > > (No objections to using SVN over CVS, right?) > > - C > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Fortress-devel mailing list > For...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fortress-devel > -- jsl...@gm... |
From: Max G. <max...@gm...> - 2007-06-02 15:45:03
|
Hi folks! 2007/6/2, Charles Goodwin <cha...@gm...>: > > Ok I set up the mailing lists properly. Now any commits to subversion > should be logged to for...@li... although you > will need to subscribe to that one manually. > > Can we disable CVS? No point using two version control systems. > > (No objections to using SVN over CVS, right?) Errr... no? :) Any particular reasons you'd like we use SVN instead of CVS? In my experience CVS is faster, easier to administer and use. BR, Max |