From: Raoul P. <pie...@wa...> - 2004-05-19 13:26:07
|
> message interessant, =E0 =E9tudier; ceci dit tu pourrais le renvoyer = sur > for...@li... ? L'autre d=E9veloppeur serait = sans > doute int=E9ress=E9, de m=EAme que les autres personnes suivant cette = liste. >=20 > Merci, >=20 > Bertrand OK. See below: If I'm right, at the moment the only way to put many validate tags = together is <fs:validate field=3D"toto" .../> =20 <fs:validate field=3D"toto" .../> =20 ... <fs:validate field=3D"toto" .../> =20 and the logic operator between tags is then "AND". I think it would be a nice thing if we can do more wide logic calculus = with validate tags. Something like: <fs:validate field=3D"toto" check=3D"A" /> <!-- by default, it's a AND = operator --> <fs:validate field=3D"toto" check=3D"B" logic=3D"or"/> =20 <fs:validate field=3D"toto" logic=3D"open"/> <!-- by default, check = attribut is empty? --> =20 <fs:validate field=3D"toto" check=3D"C" logic=3D"and"/> =20 <fs:validate field=3D"toto" check=3D"" logic=3D"open"/> =20 <fs:validate field=3D"toto" check=3D"D" logic=3D"or"/> =20 <fs:validate field=3D"toto" check=3D"E" logic=3D"close"/> =20 <fs:validate field=3D"toto" check=3D"" logic=3D"close"/>=20 for logic formula: A . B + (C . (D+E)) |