From: martin r. <fo...@ru...> - 2004-01-26 20:15:44
|
good evening again, as stated earlier, the future versions of foo should get rid of the special version of elk. some obvious changes (exporting of the pow function) i mailed to the new maintainer of elk, they were applied to the official elk release. for the libreadline support, i'll either discuss with the elk maintainer, too (perhaps it's possible to get readline support into the official elk release), or we'll use a custom "front-reader" solution like avango does. one thing remains: the semitone extension ("12s"). this extension was made deeply inside the elk reader and it's therefore not possible to replace it with a "front-reader", since that affects the reader mechanism in general (the readline-capable "front-reader" ist just for keyboard input, while the semitone-extension must also be present when reading a file e.g.). otherwise, the reader extension is no scheme standard, thus there will be no chance to get such an extension into the official elk distribution. i considered this issue with gerhard during his berlin trip. the cleanest solution would be: using the standard reader, in other words: remove the semitone extension from the reader, and replace it by a function (similar to pitch->freq). ramon: how often did you use the reader extension? would it be very complicated to replace all occurences of the semitone syntax by a function (semi->ratio or whatever)? since it's a simple text processing, this task could be done by a sed-someliner, i think... all the best, martin -- martinrumori (ma...@ru...) /* home is where your home directory is */ |