[foo-devel] OK to commit? a few cleanings...

[Martin R. <fo...@ru...>]

Dear fooers,

as we discussed approx. one year ago or so, for consistency I prepared
the following cleanups:

1. foo-default-soundfile-format

-> was a variable, is now a function, with setter/getter methods:

(foo-default-soundfile format)
(set-foo-default-soundfile format!)

and the corresponding "internal" functions:

(foo:default-soundfile format)
(foo:set-default-soundfile format!)


2. foo-default-soundfile-filetype

-> same as above, plus:

-> I moved these definitions from util/soundfile-funs.foo to
   kernel/elkfoo.scm in order to have these definitions in one place
   (was distributed over both files before)

-> as I saw from Ramon's definitions in util/soundfile-funs.foo, the
   name "foo-default-soundfile-filetype" reads a bit strange, so I
   changed it to "foo-default-soundfile-type", which is more
   intuitive.

-> for consistency, this also meant to change "soundfile-filetype" to
   "soundfile-type" and the kernel function "foo:soundfile-filetype"
   to "foo:soundfile-type" in elkfoo/src/soundfile.m

-> all this hassle was caused by myself, but for the reason, that
   there was the distinction between "snd-type" and "snd-filetype",
   where "snd-type" means the Substrate class of a snd substrate.  But
   I think the risk of mixing both up is low or it should be fixed
   here (e.g. "snd-class") instead of using "soundfile-filetype",
   which is rather ugly....


3. foo-default-play-command

-> same as 1.


4. foo-default-edit-command

-> same as 1.


5. I changed all occurrences of the abovementioned variables/functions
   which I could find with grep in the scheme code.  I just wanted to
   know whether you use these functions extensively in your code,
   which would be broken by these changes, or
   whether it would be o.k. to commit these changes to CVS.


Thanks for a notice, all the best,

Martin