Re: [foo-devel] foo zkm book

[Martin R. <fo...@ru...>]

Dear fooers again,

thanks for your message, Ramon.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:54:09AM +0100, Ramon Gonzalez-Arroyo wrote:
> The people downloading Foo, get some old version as compared to the  
> ones svn'ing it. We said at some point that that we should have a  
> downloading version update, and for that it would be convenient   
> (i.e. use it as an excuse) to do some general inspection/cleaning and  
> documentation. I think we talked about that when last we met, a year  
> and something ago. Actually, I have started n times parts of this  
> process, so I have here and there, corrections, testers and docs. We  
> are all busy so it is a question that one starts and pushes a bit  
> (with loving care) another one, and so on.

Yes, we should go on with this in order to have at least a 0.1.0
release soonish.

>   I still have my linux around and do use it. One of these days,  
> however, I will go for some ubuntu thing or something of the kind,  
> because by now my system looks like a warrior coming back from the  
> crusades, a bit lame, one eye less, scarfs everywhere, but  upright  
> and proud (somehow).

Good to hear!  Imagine how a window system would look like in this
situation :-)

> I see you are using macports, have you then dropped fink ?

It seems that fink has been discontinued, and the former DarwinPorts
seems to have been replaced by MacPorts.  That's why there does not
seem to be any fink anymore, just MacPorts.

> Does the conf distinguish between OSX 10.5 and 10.4. ? I guess so,  
> but I thought better to ask before svn'ing your last changes.

The foo conf does not especially distinguish between 10.5 and 10.4,
but there were very little changes.  Actually, it *should* work on
both.  I try to check on a 10.4 system.

All the best,

Martin