From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-08-10 16:01:04
|
On 8/7/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > So the problem is, the non-framed feed list does not include per-feed item statistics. (# of > total / unread / saved items) > ISTR talk of having the ability to hide the feed list (left frame) in the > framed view as a compromise between the framed vs. non-framed camps. Why not just have two distinct views like we have in 0.3? On 8/7/06, khaled Abou Alfa <bro...@gm...> wrote: > I thought that was always the way we were going to play it. Ideally the USER > gets to choose which view they would like best, as I can't stand the full > view. Too much information to digest in one time. Is this possible? Could we get a consensus on how "full view" is going to work? I want to add to the "full view" bug that is already there for the items that are missing. (per-feed item statistics. (# of total / unread / saved items) Hopefully "full view" will be equivalent to "panel view" in the new UI. > Also I would imagine that the we would have the full view or the framed view as the > first thing the user sees rather than enter the admin panel? I agree on this. I think this is just a fine tune thing. |