Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way
|
From: khaled A. A. <bro...@gm...> - 2006-08-09 11:41:09
|
Okay that's DEFINITELY not what I've got going here :). That looks brilliant!!! Erm...hang on a minute which folder should I be taking the above from? I think I got the files from the UIDesign folder or something along those lines. Could you possibly send through the latest files for me because I've obviously not got the proper SVN folder? Is it too much hassle as a zip or something like that? On 8/9/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote: > > Thanks for the screenshot Khaled - this is not how it should look > currently. I may not have checked something in - though I don't see > anything missing. > What browser/OS are you using too? Maybe something in how the css > url's are being put together for the missing icons. And seems like > your feeds.php (sidebar) is old? > I've attached what I see in frames view. > > Also - what you are calling "Full View" is really the "Admin Panel". > > Andrew > > > On 8/9/06, Broken Kode <bro...@gm...> wrote: > > Yeah for some reason I don't get the odd even breakdown into the list in > > the feeds.php file. (see screenshot) > > > > It's strange but I can't see (from viewing the page source) how the odd > > even seperation occurs in the panel.php but that works for some strange > > reason. Is everyone else getting the same thing? > > (see screenshot) > > > > > > (You can also see the beginnings of putting it all together.) > > > > Regarding removing frame completely, this would mean that the way in > > which the programme is used is changed no? I mean that would mean > > scrolling would be different etc? I really like the structure of the > > frames it just feels like a natural way to deal with things to be > > honest. > > > > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 22:01 -0400, Andrew Turner wrote: > > > We're agreed that there will be both a Full-width items, and > > > FeedList/Items view. > > > You can click on a feed name in the panel to view items in either > > > Full/'Frame' view > > > > > > In the past, the problem w/ the code was that Full and Frame had > > > diff't menu items, etc. which was the problem. Now that the menu items > > > will be the same, all is well. The only difference is that there *can* > > > be a left sidebar for feeds/categories/tags that when clicked will > > > change the items in the right-side. > > > > > > I would like to do away with the <frames> and instead implement the > > > "frames" view as a single page, with an optional: > > > > > > <div id="sidebar" style="overflow:auto;"> > > > feed 1 > > > feed 2 > > > ... > > > </div> > > > kind of listing. That would really be the only difference. That would > > > either show/hide either via PHP code, or via a Javascript show/hide > > > sidebar. > > > > > > Khaled - I don't think I know what you need for the alternating. (same > > > as Kevin's question). The rows do currently alternate color, and are > > > changed by <tr> and <tr class='even-row'>. Does that not work for you? > > > > > > Andrew > > > On 8/8/06, Broken Kode <bro...@gm...> wrote: > > > > TO kill this issue, I really don't see a problem with the exception > of > > > > what we decide is the DEFAULT. > > > > > > > > Full view or Framed view don't really differ in anything but the > > > > sidebar. However we can have that come in or out as part of an > option > > > > you click in the options bar. > > > > > > > > The difference in structure is effectively, for Framed View: > > > > > > > > <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" > > > > > <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" /> > > > > <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" > > > > > <frame src="feeds.php?view=frames" name="menu" /> > > > > <frame src="view.php?view=frames" name="items" /> > > > > </frameset> > > > > </frameset> > > > > > > > > For Full view: > > > > > > > > <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" > > > > > <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" /> > > > > <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" > > > > > <frame src="view.php?view=frames" name="items" /> > > > > </frameset> > > > > </frameset> > > > > > > > > > > > > We're effectively taking away one line. I honestly don't see much of > a > > > > problem here, with the exception of what we decide should be the > > > > default. I've voiced my opinion on this matter but I've been known > to be > > > > completely of base in the past so maybe we simply put it as a vote. > > > > > > > > As for what the categories and tags will look like, that's > effectively > > > > just like the framed view, but instead of the feed running down the > left > > > > hand side panel we have the category or tag. So if you want to read > > > > items regarding the design category you simply click on that, or > > > > whatever. Nothing too fancy to be honest. > > > > > > > > Final point, I just would like the feeds or categories or tags in > the > > > > left hand frame to have an odd or even nature so that we can have > the > > > > light grey/dark grey structure. If anyone can modify the existing > code > > > > from the panel.php file that would be great so that I can continue > > > > hacking and slicing :). > > > > > > > > Hope that all makes sense. > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 16:01 -0700, Miles Beck wrote: > > > > > On 8/8/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote: > > > > > > The sidebar can use javascript to show/hide the feeds sidebar, > and > > > > > > maybe fallback to "dual view" for non-javascript browsers. > > > > > > > > > > Does this mean that we will not have support for the panel view > like > > > > > it is in 0.3 (but with the new UI)? > > > > > > > > > > I'm not really sure what showing/hiding the feeds sidebar does for > us. > > > > > And if this is the compromise for the panel view. > > > > > > > > > > -Miles > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > > > > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your > job easier > > > > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > > > > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Fofredux-devel mailing list > > > > > Fof...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > > > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your > job easier > > > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > > > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Fofredux-devel mailing list > > > > Fof...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Andrew Turner > ajt...@hi... 42.4266N x 83.4931W > http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > Fofredux-devel mailing list > Fof...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > > > > |
