From: Evan R. <eva...@gm...> - 2006-06-09 16:40:45
|
I'm an american, so it's tough to cheer for germany...but i was just out getting a new satellite dish, and there is absolutely noone on the streets anywhere. the guys at the shop were annoyed they had to stop watching the game and help me...this country is crazy for their soccer. /evan On 6/9/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > khaled Abou Alfa wrote: > > > Ah ok, it's just that as I've been using FOFR more and more lately > > that's been one of the issues that I've found to be a tad bit > > annoying. The speed of updating feeds. Originally I thought there was > > little we could do, but if there's a newer better framework in place > > that might help sort out that aspect of the programme then I'm all up > > for it :). > > Anyone with more then a handful of feeds has had this problem. Update > is a sequential operation and if one feed is slow to respond, it slows > down the whole operation. > > I think feature #1371230 is a good solution for this. You'll be able to > set a time of how often you want each feed to update. When update_all > runs, it will look for only the feeds that have not been updated since > $update_interval. That way, only a subset of your feeds will update > during each run. Hopefully, the ones you are most interested in > keeping fresh, because you will have set a lower update interval for them. > > -Kevin > > > _______________________________________________ > Fofredux-devel mailing list > Fof...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > |