Re: [Fofredux-devel] cache_time on feeds

[Kevin <ke...@dr...>]

Evan Roth wrote:
...
> in the end it's not absolutely necessary, but the auto-timestamping on 
> cache_time needs to go.  i suspect that the adodb stuff adds it, when 
> we add the field, as it's the first timestamp in the table.
I still don't understand.   What about the handling of the cache_time 
field is wrong?   Could you provide a test case so I can reproduce it?

-Kevin